Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932197AbWHHHzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 03:55:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932262AbWHHHzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 03:55:19 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:47317 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932197AbWHHHzR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 03:55:17 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Manuel Reimer Subject: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16 Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:34:48 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e40bf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060720 SeaMonkey/1.0.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 708 Lines: 17 Hello, could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? There have been some bugs: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757 and maybe there are more of them. I would like to stay on the 2.6.16 branch as I don't like to update my kernel several times a week. I just want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs. Thank you very much in advance Yours Manuel Reimer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/