Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932545AbWHHIud (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:50:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932548AbWHHIud (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:50:33 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:16025 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932545AbWHHIuc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:50:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:50:17 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: Manuel Reimer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16 Message-ID: <20060808185017.A2528231@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Manuel.Spam@nurfuerspam.de on Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 24 On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote: > Hello, > > could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? > There have been some bugs: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757 These are the same problem. 2.6.16 is unaffected. > want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs. For XFS, its goodness. 2.6.18 will be good too, and 2.6.17.7+. cheers. -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/