Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework tegra_smmu_probe_device()
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        joro@8bytes.org
Cc:     vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20201002060807.32138-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
 <20201002060807.32138-3-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <070a13b2-cde2-ab9e-7ee0-8fb71fb64d5d@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:23:14 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201002060807.32138-3-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

02.10.2020 09:08, Nicolin Chen пишет:
>  static struct iommu_device *tegra_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> -	struct tegra_smmu *smmu = NULL;
> -	struct of_phandle_args args;
> -	unsigned int index = 0;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	while (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index,
> -					  &args) == 0) {
> -		smmu = tegra_smmu_find(args.np);
> -		if (smmu) {
> -			err = tegra_smmu_configure(smmu, dev, &args);
> -			of_node_put(args.np);
> -
> -			if (err < 0)
> -				return ERR_PTR(err);
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * Only a single IOMMU master interface is currently
> -			 * supported by the Linux kernel, so abort after the
> -			 * first match.
> -			 */
> -			dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, smmu);
> -
> -			break;
> -		}
> -
> -		of_node_put(args.np);
> -		index++;
> -	}
> +	struct tegra_smmu *smmu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>  
>  	if (!smmu)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);

The !smmu can't ever be true now, isn't it? Then please remove it.