Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:20:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:20:37 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:19726 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:20:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:19:18 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Alan Cox Cc: "David S. Miller" , jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, miles@megapathdsl.net, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What is standing in the way of opening the 2.5 tree? Message-ID: <20011031141918.C905@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20011030192902.B22781@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > The second patch is patch which implements new quota format. It makes > > changes in quotactl() interface and other changes visible in userspace. > > I think that is the reason why Linus doesn't want it in 2.4 and I agree with him. > > The problem is that without it 32bit uids are useless. That means any real > world ldap using customer can't use Linus quotas. > > I'd really like to figure a way the code can handle both at once In principle both formats can exist in one kernel. The problem is how to fit them into quotactl() syscall and don't bloat it too much. I'll try to write something... Honza -- Jan Kara SuSE CR Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/