From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: swsusp regression [Was: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:59:15 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Jason Lunz <lunz@gehennom.net>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       andre@linux-ide.org, pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@osdl.org,
       linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
References: <20060806030809.2cfb0b1e.akpm@osdl.org> <44D8626F.4020101@gmail.com> <20060808104353.GK4025@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060808104353.GK4025@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608081259.15966.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2230
Lines: 48

On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:43, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08 2006, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >On Monday 07 August 2006 18:23, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > >>In gmane.linux.kernel, you wrote:
> > >>>>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc3/2.6.18-rc3-mm2/
> > >>>I tried it and guess what :)... swsusp doesn't work :@.
> > >>>
> > >>>This time I was able to dump process states with sysrq-t:
> > >>>http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/ide2.gif
> > >>>
> > >>>My guess is ide2/2.0 dies (hpt370 driver), since last thing kernel 
> > >>>prints is suspending device 2.0
> > >>Does it go away if you revert this?
> > >>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc3/2.6.18-rc3-mm2/broken-out/ide-reprogram-disk-pio-timings-on-resume.patch
> > >>
> > >>That should only affect resume, not suspend, but it does mess around
> > >>with ide power management. Is this maybe happening on the *second*
> > >>suspend?
> > >>
> > >>>-hdc: ATAPI 63X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(33)
> > >>>+hdc: ATAPI CD-ROM drive, 0kB Cache, UDMA(33)
> > >>This looks suspicious. -mm does have several ide-fix-hpt3xx patches.
> > >
> > >I found that git-block.patch broke the suspend for me.  Still have no idea
> > >what's up with it.
> > 
> > I suspect elevator changes. The wait_for_completion is not woken in
> > ide-io by ll_rw_blk. But I don't understand block layer too much.
> 
> The ide changes are far more likely, it's probably missing a completion.

Actually I think the commit f74bf2e6b415588e562fdcfdd454d587eb33cd46
(Remove ->waiting member from struct request) is wrong, because
generic_ide_suspend() uses the end_of_io member of rq to pass the PM data
to ide_do_drive_cmd() where the pointer gets overwritten by &wait (must_wait
is "true", because action == ide_wait).  Previously &wait was stored in
rq->waiting and it didn't overwrite the PM data.

Haven't tested yet, though.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/