Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 2 Oct 2020 12:02:11 -0500
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To:     Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable GPIO and I2C configs for TI's J721e platform
Message-ID: <20201002170211.ghzbjqt6nti6mssh@attakatha>
References: <20201002164535.9920-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201002164535.9920-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Precedence: bulk

On 22:15-20201002, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> The following patches enable configs in the arm64 defconfig to support
> GPIO and I2C support on TI's J721e platform.
> 
> Faiz Abbas (2):
>   arm64: defconfig: Enable OMAP I2C driver
>   arm64: defconfig: Enable DAVINCI_GPIO driver
> 
>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)


Could we do an audit and make sure nothing else is missing - Say ALSA /
DRM or something else?

And I don't really see the need to split these into individual patches,
maybe, take a hint from [1]


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200630171500.11438-1-geert+renesas@glider.be/
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D