Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1576790pxk; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:13:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNV+X9wXks2lyXi9YzXMOmEBoP1Z9VhphOzSJoP3IZ5bFkj8F6Hu22/tpqf6+Bgqwrb/OD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9443:: with SMTP id z3mr4069343ejx.156.1601669633445; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:13:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601669633; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C+M7nZk29j9Z2yvw1yPUnAiuYxuKnXg76Sop8vL6wGBzJGgVn7BmzktBko6OtE3CcI uZ/LIwEoYpuY5uxlMoQftiJeYjuMgnRCgEYlX3VLeLyrDjQmVENoIYBPj/reTo71d3TS 6J+fPD3Ro1dD+DMwdhiwQ0FVEwoJwCvoSp1LvZkXEB2otKqepnSiSNv/6tvmi/afiywp yKA5zirAqoHf8oKhpd2ROw8Osew4VqSLmG+t82c0036Jza5+5q49p7mRN9heQpmSxGP/ vlN/5oiSi70VyJi2/sd1IRNuaxgoICJJ1Lf0TUgAN8m34uDsePJ33XI1+qjotpLZIEDO 7NLw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=1+1gQ3KcXmka62+xebYBiNM/MDx9pvdpWff7sNy5Fn0=; b=EWfI2eDWiktUMEfbTtLPE7RFAEoha4Jen1fFn9rw+QMkHEStVxvP7UJl6x3jeYRHFz HufoeyeMTmCfKsoM15SYmbb1j3UOBoRz/0Dy/ZmS6vGqX7Aj7VH48PZZ6kOBhFx6UmuC AroQ80E3rOqTcMra/GF17nC4fb/fJxe1FmXIM/NL5K+Gd7QEEeQmrIiBDAn2MwrV+8po UwTyXx2nq5GBZ/4Y1ZlDQr5yGIRBt/6WJZLdMtjnvl/IWO/4k8+pAJ8NhcAvE+78WfLC Z2vCF6HRc2HktWdNoybYHes7yp8XMFdybKJhx7EP4PvIcAgAJTAyhTzCIZn0zvFE73C2 NFMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vGpoU4NR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pv11si1841053ejb.428.2020.10.02.13.13.30; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vGpoU4NR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725601AbgJBUMX (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:12:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725300AbgJBUMX (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:12:23 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com (mail-lf1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E58C0613D0; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id b22so3315481lfs.13; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1+1gQ3KcXmka62+xebYBiNM/MDx9pvdpWff7sNy5Fn0=; b=vGpoU4NRCdk72NAV24Pu6YePTXcoDhSfkcOmKh6ZdPs3y8kqTUF4X0UXexlTSmV98E Jn/MZBJcnbQpPUCYx/3j6lnEgBx549dMp0OlTz5mbd/aGmOdLfNTT5FTQ9Bh0wCvJoXy PR72pZydGLdM6onTvd9po32qPZM+FVLu+IZ+99kvaww/G+PqaRFEFjil9DxM15z/OT/n C5zURxnhFNlsp1dLHn8dVM7iK1Fi9kgtrcLAJ010NJONyBnuF6C8uhUZaoiqppXB83ZU Wocxk1Fb5savcKXKb4OO8BOsqwzTp/UIB7Cbdfc/4gck4V4HtSsmTCA9C9+vPFbE6gIG ZP1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1+1gQ3KcXmka62+xebYBiNM/MDx9pvdpWff7sNy5Fn0=; b=QHvj6RzZ3BPjsfrHxSXTA6hgyF7CZY5920jdI783our9jiW7pGXK+e31mgK2J2KJhr xt7C0RanwWVf8Ib2E+HKgHTsHhs/eAfnHltNn/ssJMkA0FV32bidE1WXkCOTXrz91vNM A/U+A2B4jF8Q991h2hxeU97uueANLxHEXzn1UDy75WYkpEAqzdQsJplht4IXwCLCGz0l rGnbWzBWrXczFDJCoicHsBUR56rq64dyeFmIGeizIVC2duQrJX293hw8c2Z7/bonQTCz 7NJ3NBxvwMbrxgM6rC19qwR3lnOwHW4mUJqM6O0Glgz01ivzszfjWsO8b4rp4pgLnBWf pxsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hLutD6PeE1BFstv2ZvvAici96QoGirqtyUP5JORH1vvs7QFx6 Y3FIhOdaAUMNF+0To3cOGkR63egg+68= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:511c:: with SMTP id q28mr1342676lfb.411.1601669539800; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (109-252-91-252.nat.spd-mgts.ru. [109.252.91.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w17sm571611lfn.55.2020.10.02.13.12.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Use fwspec in tegra_smmu_(de)attach_dev To: Nicolin Chen Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, joro@8bytes.org, vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20201002060807.32138-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20201002060807.32138-2-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20201002194508.GD29706@Asurada-Nvidia> From: Dmitry Osipenko Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 23:12:18 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201002194508.GD29706@Asurada-Nvidia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 02.10.2020 22:45, Nicolin Chen пишет: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 05:41:50PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 02.10.2020 09:08, Nicolin Chen пишет: >>> static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, >>> struct device *dev) >>> { >>> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); >>> struct tegra_smmu *smmu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); >>> struct tegra_smmu_as *as = to_smmu_as(domain); >>> - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; >>> - struct of_phandle_args args; >>> unsigned int index = 0; >>> int err = 0; >>> >>> - while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index, >>> - &args)) { >>> - unsigned int swgroup = args.args[0]; >>> - >>> - if (args.np != smmu->dev->of_node) { >>> - of_node_put(args.np); >>> - continue; >>> - } >>> - >>> - of_node_put(args.np); >>> + if (!fwspec) >>> + return -ENOENT; >> >> Could the !fwspec ever be true here as well? > > There are multiple callers of this function. It's really not that > straightforward to track every one of them. So I'd rather have it > here as other iommu drivers do. We are human beings, so we could > have missed something somewhere, especially callers are not from > tegra-* drivers. > I'm looking at the IOMMU core and it requires device to be in IOMMU group before attach_dev() could be called. The group can't be assigned to device without the fwspec, see tegra_smmu_device_group(). Seems majority of IOMMU drivers are checking dev_iommu_priv_get() for NULL in attach_dev(), some not checking anything, some check both and only arm-smmu checks the fwspec.