Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1593243079.git.syednwaris@gmail.com> <CACRpkdYyCNEUSOtCJMTm7t1z15oK7nH3KcTe5LreJAzZ0KtQuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200911225417.GA5286@shinobu> <CACRpkdah+k-EyhF8bNRkvw4bFDiai9dYo3ph9wsumo_v3U-U0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200929130743.GB4458@shinobu> <CAHp75VdtUr1KHD5bng4sHZqsR888gN_TJ-bN8oLsX8GpsM8wYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdY-SwOx9tGyvrZy_VZJgHyG4ipo27bPnTe==o8_b_CTfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY-SwOx9tGyvrZy_VZJgHyG4ipo27bPnTe==o8_b_CTfg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 3 Oct 2020 02:28:55 +0530
Message-ID: <CACG_h5or4anPqMRv5HOpe6CDOAWTY8rBot9G82p=9TABL1qCMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:59 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Linus, are you referencing to [3]? It was fixed in GENMASK()
> > implementation some time ago.
> > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202006171559.JSbGJXNw%25lkp@intel.com/
>
> Yup.
>
> I tried to apply the patches again now to test it but now patch 2
> needs to be rebased.
>
> Sorry for all the trouble!
>
> Syed can you rebase the patch set on v5.9-rc1 and resend as v10?

Sure Linus. I will send it as soon as possible.

Thanks
Syed Nayyar Waris