Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1692281pxk; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:00:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzx9+y/xXlOPHvYh3f6E4SdG9Cio6//lzbKybObtZPDuajsOYbPvI0Nfn0Tbx0AvgtOQQI8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:346:: with SMTP id r6mr5411469edw.301.1601683203252; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:00:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601683203; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kayn6283LL11wjirTbxEuPJrxCiRrYfcoFk1N/eNmmwapgim60MY4IgRmYk5g9cUgB FqaWbu5Bs3pPj6YIh0CJf3VscTdWqzzonbQX7WHm4OsRmKKiKr4SM4Wd4DEgtdmY/e2V OCbtE5TJ3NWIl06HuU1Ssc5ineoKrFPmIsPOkwisP2G19YS10dD4FXJMKoRAUPaIKd7R ms5Vd9uAdETvQyF3aOOPF1/dco1TtZAPFGXJ0W4IefVl8ccttyBZ6JzMfS+FPZG8tLUg v23GX4d8Oc1wP/vVRElP0pEoVST2M1kFX+97HZTH+gyF9UIgOt7FN/vV4oMiC9o9JM1/ 3J3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=n3FtDjywRYZVCPo0ueVtBW5R3Lk6yWZXURM1EQ0TNlg=; b=a1OM8qBsyQX4c05RBN8EgGn46SiRiFjzjqm4+6k/9tsyH1w4pnroSkdILa0fK/cR0L 2E4/yfuzLHfg0S1qm78tH1Bk+HYpw2lCE0lfk8ZyNWBvHiS2OvDm6RMtDLfDnbOGDx8H PURH7SEpcwBrOEnr4sMNuQwaJ6lvQVLEmyKvfsms3dJ9JywSzBQ8s0xY3gFEd2egbLvv pp4/KMCdN3UfN80QE701XtLc67SXkdJ+bjo1Mctfus9P0Adn1w49r+rpyIcaa/g2oW4B yTB5HcqnqItHfxssj8Y0B5PMPtRftz9V/XCCf3hSX6WhJwvMl9+/HAROxuhVEFB1nkZw jkGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Ct22wxHp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b18si2181830ejz.84.2020.10.02.16.59.40; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Ct22wxHp; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725766AbgJBX6j (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 19:58:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58334 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725283AbgJBX6j (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 19:58:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12646C0613E3 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id 144so2479818pfb.4 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:58:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n3FtDjywRYZVCPo0ueVtBW5R3Lk6yWZXURM1EQ0TNlg=; b=Ct22wxHpRWzfOSSiVXmEfzF79sGTyyQOBW5bFbAJcU2MyV6Gr+9C/tweJxKTY8abc3 aLbjT0ZSLxIR/9asN1PG8Z3tYSpqYTsVGfm04sSyWCs0+mzf5fkNn2w5LdiGikwwLGv8 Q+acAVlqHn8iDeJqG7XPL8JqC+klaIYsNAGnqVoGKBo9s0RXZKqbi5Z7ybJkvHSEbRGI Io+knCVn35v41Lc+fv4U/lUc09GRfLPZNg9UAeCHQURJNKzfArdC0vVsaO3pmZNhactW D4s8OC0VswuJ4FzKiwNm19i5wYp+jZ5AY21jW9WiHVaDBOYfnfbnX2KYnDpX13785DpD pBzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n3FtDjywRYZVCPo0ueVtBW5R3Lk6yWZXURM1EQ0TNlg=; b=LyPw16x4xVDCFgNBIkgdp7Dn+sLX3LpiXqxFMBMoPmwMl3orDpWDu+eAvytIqD2jjY z5ag0yqhp7dx4ezmlo87j0gRhJ0FAM5Xned2gpUr/ds1D4JnP9aqq5ZXe8Oeq9EZki34 09yv9zxVDLyoYABqHjEIP0JRiGmPH8emwaip6Qdf34fsMKFABwbEdmwILXI8Xup6WVq6 vewt/JA4BE+kcbeAV4uF90pA/+rRzNZpQJhyPIS8EOrre9T3lGYYZFI/ar1hNQnyfBcz pe6Wt28TobZVIpUb8F4tgKbREH7pidDG0lFvlTIVt0i2qdK2PFbR/1mNaq0HC5G9RW8r /y9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MR98qMLuIwOqLFV6PoTb6EmwZMys0vuKZ8t2D3sVItiz6PE3C vPDJHvHoElie+2E2r26+CgmcDQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8ec7:0:b029:13e:d13d:a137 with SMTP id b7-20020aa78ec70000b029013ed13da137mr5408059pfr.31.1601683115490; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([66.219.217.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z13sm2735593pjn.51.2020.10.02.16.58.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] block: scsi_ioctl: Avoid the use of one-element arrays To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook References: <20201002231033.GA6273@embeddedor> <20201003000338.GA13557@embeddedor> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:58:33 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201003000338.GA13557@embeddedor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/2/20 6:03 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 05:53:05PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/2/20 5:10 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/cdrom.h b/include/uapi/linux/cdrom.h >>> index 2817230148fd..6c34f6e2f1f7 100644 >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/cdrom.h >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/cdrom.h >>> @@ -289,7 +289,10 @@ struct cdrom_generic_command >>> unsigned char data_direction; >>> int quiet; >>> int timeout; >>> - void __user *reserved[1]; /* unused, actually */ >>> + union { >>> + void __user *reserved[1]; /* unused, actually */ >>> + void __user *unused; >>> + }; >> >> What's the point of this union, why not just turn it into >> >> void * __user *unused; >> >> ? > > I just don't want to take any chances of breaking any user-space > application that, for some reason, may be considering that field. I guess that's a valid concern, who knows what applications are doing to an ignored field. I'll apply it, thanks. -- Jens Axboe