Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1741927pxk; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:50:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhOBfwyZPWj2kc/p+/KAZS1TkmYm9D4mk/LkZDWlsMh2U/DC+7JyJPLt9uhXOfLBXMqpV9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2655:: with SMTP id i21mr4649349ejc.511.1601689825225; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 18:50:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601689825; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ThLpmsDyPuK/SXyavtZpgOvxL0RNUk5fijDkEnq2KGGuGIsitqXpZXKHvhtSSt7q4v 6+6R/KVXie6HfXg5X1V/hZToF1F//rB9tGPlbS7N/od6ML1scvMuIKkf8UpANRAIqYdD zIj+tkbKqLmXjErAY54ZstsTa2CDvHKRQlKWNTJsuB7iexFsZZCdmlNBb5UVw401CYpR G1ycdzzQa/ztK0TdYese3q7I0qnCf2HP79Z1DoLdG8HBn4JKDFTg+kxi+vWsWOaYqBut R6nuoaxDK/HUguadY7bMZji/xFHJGPDCP1Jqzn4HaDJHqNwjN+PnQ8Yr9aC92Ov8/858 Y+og== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=71bkXOVLDwtVOfCToFQug21Guut6/gzkIwIbpUN54pU=; b=dYrqPnKsX5f0Bz+mW/krxC9OKrIpeyFpt8J57lXaP1bPzk6kc+jkUzemNfIHU+K0x7 eJfnJVIn9t2B1H1JP/8IX5JfFYZ1ben9L1Eac8wWcM3ap05iyc43v+iXg6hI7WsA5tBk nE7NzVc3SIfIE0Z4MihDFp+5G5z9Jvu8HhSByI7UBsicRiPw3hRQXVTPxsSfnnkHX4eL 2LMLzfJQ+dDlIUGEPj3PoaZ7AEQZVzHnrFRryxz9Q49fwWk0un1n2+u14LCvb/q6xa6E 8cvvrmo3DiZ1cmiuB+HWpMPX7GQbuLiIZ8VNnxpnnuiFgAeznG4youZzJs3G2tEF9for 9kkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=Stsdcz9+; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id do17si1855316ejc.502.2020.10.02.18.50.02; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 18:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=Stsdcz9+; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725681AbgJCBtD (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:49:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46874 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725536AbgJCBtC (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:49:02 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB93AC0613D0; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:49:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1601689741; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=71bkXOVLDwtVOfCToFQug21Guut6/gzkIwIbpUN54pU=; b=Stsdcz9+U/j6iA8iXss1yQDZNcosRTdUDPWRE2f5ZfXME3KPt7Sc/bygXerI4m9jr6H4qy PyxaWzybcRfck8t2dqtxw+Up1jMRIzAz19lSKnBBAgCyl94DnRuI5EiIytdtpMZfnL5Vc0 qRZus32aUW0MAVF5XgsAXPHHwdlGSI7H1XPq5Wb4uvR1t9QxpCY4PjV15I8OA/pmm7xh3w S3cJyhvNn4jM+dYvLJzSx/cHAmDPL/ZyvOOkQMKnpjpoEMICA/F2W1G+7ZRm7J3yv2YlGR LpnjiLV+xqkxS56HG6lDWcfxk9WkBPNlrvNODteJ0+Au5Jhz2wr/Lfb03f7E6Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1601689741; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=71bkXOVLDwtVOfCToFQug21Guut6/gzkIwIbpUN54pU=; b=iV1y8z8rfRPNqmaatTN5Ch/TxyHSucga7L+TOVQRCIB2c9BSOcceWzJHhYdvEiDsDfW/ks G1qVZ+DNTTsxu0Dg== To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] task_work: use TIF_TASKWORK if available In-Reply-To: <20201002153849.GC29066@redhat.com> References: <20201001194208.1153522-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <20201001194208.1153522-4-axboe@kernel.dk> <20201002151415.GA29066@redhat.com> <871rigejb8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20201002153849.GC29066@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 03:49:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8lkcc4z.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 02 2020 at 17:38, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 10/02, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> I think it's fundamentaly wrong that we have several places and several >> flags which handle task_work_run() instead of having exactly one place >> and one flag. > > Damn yes, agreed. Actually there are TWO places, but they don't interfere: 1) exit to user 2) enter guest From the kernel POV they are pretty much the same as both are leaving the kernel domain. But they have a few subtle different requirements what has to be done or not. So any change to that logic needs to fixup both places, Thanks, tglx