Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
        Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
        Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] riscv: Fixup static_obj() fail
References: <1593266228-61125-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org>
        <1593266228-61125-2-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org>
        <20200911204512.GA2705@aurel32.net>
        <CAJF2gTQiLV8sDE5cnvP=aBog4zaiMvMeieg_JtXwRODky1u3Hg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20200914103836.GB2705@aurel32.net>
Date:   Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:25:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20200914103836.GB2705@aurel32.net> (Aurelien Jarno's message of
        "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:38:36 +0200")
Message-ID: <87lfglt6z1.fsf@igel.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Sep 14 2020, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

> How should we proceed to get that fixed in time for 5.9? For the older
> branches where it has been backported (so far 5.7 and 5.8), should we
> just get that commit reverted instead?

Why is this still broken?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."