Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: lm3697: Fix out-of-bound access
To:     <ultracoolguy@tutanota.com>
CC:     Marek Behun <kabel@blackhole.sk>, Pavel <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Leds <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
References: <MIiYgay--3-2@tutanota.com> <20201005141334.36d9441a@blackhole.sk>
 <MIt2NiS--3-2@tutanota.com> <3c5fce56-8604-a7d5-1017-8a075f67061e@ti.com>
 <MItBqjy--3-2@tutanota.com>
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <966c3f39-1310-dd60-6f33-0d9464ed2ff1@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:41:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MItBqjy--3-2@tutanota.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

Gabriel

On 10/5/20 9:38 AM, ultracoolguy@tutanota.com wrote:
> I understand. So I should leave it like it was and do the rename in another patch?

You should do the fix in one patch and leave the structure name alone.

The structure naming if fine and has no benefit and actually will make 
it more difficult for others to backport future fixes.

Unless Pavel finds benefit in accepting the structure rename.

Dan