Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp3488271pxk; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:55:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBg15wAFmpwXb10+qUTNP4TDL7R5wdAQy8K56b+oAU9NgZ0oT8bbVDGd0nrL/OjbXxDMVg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4dc7:: with SMTP id f7mr905446ejw.73.1601920546825; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601920546; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BTidEt9u2gYkeOF3ickVhAy3URQphYeHeL/Jk/WZwmDve80Cef3Zk8+Qnbwy+rv7QH LcADUYrszQKvArCK1vnjTOtNsKt027OIgNX4+UzVbGMuzsRLjd3GIOruEOTBz3dYwNvz +eK0WKfJ1QxdW0W+yK8oM+f0hDLmg9NpwX/YgJ5agEj4k8ISZgsRwdZdqXwzYjAk3sc3 K66MqPu+ueE8dtactEOaJPftBa1tUZ2ZSgPXyWv6meZl8XB41b+bpFdwUN5UFffyAx6I 9+LNv1HyB8YOo17FYbcjknUpLTxvjVUjLUkOlhAdMji6JVZ2rHdqTG1FFzE7B+9n78pL 4vcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=9E85LeUC9fzbhN9VYe9QKN0L+FRAAc0JnAQy3SaRq1U=; b=VOGdKKQWkWfyLxGEHCdNZy/Q4f5E9sAWDolISyJdvoygdbLEnlf3daf7qusNwCxsBL RbfnAOCBxCeCZipGQH9Cn/CHe69uOiwwfZxwa8rhg2htOvXW6QTaIWNqrlUjQoFalclW G1nOlJT2rNh6CJqCBAFBs8ugmfK4eUO7sj9m6Q3xYCj5tfqFsnunEa880EoINPUzU2qQ g5IVGlZ1yi1AzpQn6vdip3iSYpxXe4LltSU4qXL+IgL9x82adnapqx0s447fZfSGUgiq vawzI9LJ2t3PKwXZSAmTkYS9WW1i+2F0ESTObH7rJYyczqSWk8/JSucDEHmEV3d8J2EK Ajlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h5hIFeEW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z15si294661ejr.202.2020.10.05.10.55.22; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h5hIFeEW; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728068AbgJEQOV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:14:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55848 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726657AbgJEQOU (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:14:20 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x241.google.com (mail-lj1-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::241]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A90C0613CE for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x241.google.com with SMTP id a4so3400983lji.12 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9E85LeUC9fzbhN9VYe9QKN0L+FRAAc0JnAQy3SaRq1U=; b=h5hIFeEWqehMLSP98uk9ISfHhL6GdIc+qwL/W4YrngM/qqApbLJdUNkf4sYgqGifdK PxUc8fKIGJsB8YchL+lwB1IX+VXMczTYCjzbQBJNG14Kateh/hnmF7+ZxxSt26+McNe5 Gx0FpCcxJknySjfQZHZPyeTCnSRvXsum8wZcQP1/rqgkXIcYEcXKBTNZQDSFkiAUElHx Bb04ZpP9MchbsaUYXuvzoa8AHRvjYfJ1pC6s9PIpK4gmWYNxhEJgYgQOWhmskj/QoFUm OFMu730wmF8ZeCiOkorKnKMF6zFSOfIHMeILWLb+UCE6l7472wV7sEQDG7UuPrYpn7YK EZcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9E85LeUC9fzbhN9VYe9QKN0L+FRAAc0JnAQy3SaRq1U=; b=JPJUyxNWt5uHUDfXWzRFvtp75PYUQIxfXFfUJ28BGB18IbzQfd0sVC37tnJ0Aq/Khc eEKErvarq7w6HHLCKjkbe258hO77vczAQBF58o7OwfoWFu0zKbLB1gE/OT0FOQ33zR/q aa5lItyEDCQ9Do2D+PDqm1RYnKPuSgiL7on8oR3/4bp1sG70FrR/mPHnP++dG7RbwMQy 1vvVTybQYeRfpny2Aj5apgOZPwBS1m1DrEnBpHrK6EiDLp34fkNB58LGVfef0sNXEvwb 5vAOGbaafFlIfdqczgDbXEJFsuuv782z4qTA7rb/S0EtHQLXZHbggChDh/qcmhixZSGY 2cXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iTknIHrMn0BZ5bArbJZTSZIwqYahbrVheOLC6oyyY7u+IauDZ JIXf19nc6JzcubYxc9TdfMQ/Mr5vl2s= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8904:: with SMTP id d4mr173008lji.322.1601914457962; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.97] (88-114-211-119.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [88.114.211.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a25sm50731lfi.267.2020.10.05.09.14.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: optionally disable brk() To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Michal Hocko , David Hildenbrand , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20201002171921.3053-1-toiwoton@gmail.com> <653873ef-2a57-37e0-1ac3-fba763652b35@redhat.com> <2a0f5ade-d770-c36e-50bc-ff0c8e9dacbf@gmail.com> <20201005061248.GN4555@dhcp22.suse.cz> <7d7b1ac5-d6a7-5e43-8fb8-12b844d7f501@gmail.com> <20201005081210.2231e552@lwn.net> From: Topi Miettinen Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:14:15 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201005081210.2231e552@lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5.10.2020 17.12, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:11:35 +0300 > Topi Miettinen wrote: > >> The point is not to shrink the kernel (it will shrink by one small >> function) or get rid of complexity. The point is to disable an inferior >> interface. Memory returned by mmap() is at a random location but with >> brk() it is located near the data segment, so the address is more easily >> predictable. > > So if your true objective is to get glibc to allocate memory differently, > perhaps the right thing to do is to patch glibc? Of course: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-October/118319.html But since glibc is pretty much the only user of brk(), it also makes sense to disable it in the kernel if nothing uses it anymore. -Topi