Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965056AbWHHVmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:42:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965058AbWHHVmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:42:50 -0400 Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70]:25749 "EHLO elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965056AbWHHVmt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:42:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=KKEcU/hHSP5YJ8t4IM+vtcZGRhqTAHqlCC6F2V1FgQQOmQQVR0DL9dTjQvGDRo/H; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Message-ID: <04b101c6bb33$9131bd00$0225a8c0@Wednesday> From: "jdow" To: , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" References: Subject: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list? Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:42:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120e26356c0b0470470ae87f3927ef6ae3b547562a158a8cca8350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.182.36 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1633 Lines: 34 From: "David Schwartz" > >> The kernel developers who need to keep the barrier to bug reports low >> like the current policy. >> >> Get a good spam filter, I only get 1-2 pieces a day in my LKML folder. >> >> Jeff > > How is everyone individually spam filtering better than one central spam > filter? More likelihood that at least one relevent person will get the bug > report? Certainly a single central spam filter can get more resources aimed > at it to make sure it doesn't suppress anything important. If you have the luxury of the ability to write personalized rules and whitelist entries for SpamAssassin it can become a startlingly good filtering system. And you can tailor the filtering for individual sources with meta rules. Processing large numbers of messages through BAYES and large numbers of rules gets quite time consuming, perhaps more than vger might want to handle. Processing only a small number of email accounts for trustworthy people allows one the luxury of custom rules and individual BAYES filtering. Since a lot of what one person might consider to be spam is another person's ham this is a good thing. (And SURBL is a good thing, too. It is remarkably reliable as long as you're not one of the first receiving a particular piece of junk. The SpamAssassin "RulesEmporium" has some very nice anti-spam rule sets, too.) {^_^} Joanne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/