Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965042AbWHHVoh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:44:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965058AbWHHVoh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:44:37 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58]:6816 "EHLO ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965042AbWHHVog (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:44:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:44:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Robert Crocombe cc: hui Bill Huey , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Darren Hart Subject: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1154541079.25723.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1154615261.32264.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060808025615.GA20364@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20060808030524.GA20530@gnuppy.monkey.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 24 On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Robert Crocombe wrote: > On 8/8/06, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > How far back do you get this bug? I mean if you go back and test the > > previous kernels, where did you start seeing this? > > I have so far been unable to provoke the problem under 2.6.16-rt29. > > I was able to provoke things once easily under 17-rt1, but subsequent > attempts to trigger the bug have so far yielded no results. > > I'm back to poking at 16-rt29 to see if the problem is simply somewhat > less likely. Is it easy to poke the problem with -rt8? Just want to know if -rt8 has caused the problem to be more prevalent. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/