Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201005225004.0d3b59a1@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20201005225004.0d3b59a1@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:57:57 +0800
Message-ID: <CAATdQgB6aN8-BXwTG7=u8c+Q7mPmU+A9=O=_7u_wbPkuVNhjvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the battery tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:50 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
>   f9d293364b45 ("power: supply: sbs-battery: keep error code when get_property() fails")
>
> Fixes tag
>
>   Fixes: c4f382930145 (power: supply: sbs-battery: don't assume i2c errors as battery disconnect)
>
> has these problem(s):
>
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
>
> Maybe you meant
>
> Fixes: 395a7251dc2b ("power: supply: sbs-battery: don't assume i2c errors as battery disconnect")
>

Yes, you're right. I guess I made a mistake here.
I'll send a v2 patch.

Thank you!

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell