Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 06:48:51 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
        =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/32] Improvements for Tegra I2C driver
Message-ID: <20201006044851.GA883@kunai>
Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
        =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200929221915.10979-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20201005205258.GB1397@kunai>
 <60ff95a4-2466-a41f-5496-2474f5a256a8@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <60ff95a4-2466-a41f-5496-2474f5a256a8@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Dmitry,

> Hello, Wolfram! Thank you! This series started with 10 small patches and
> then was growing with every new review round because more ideas were
> suggested and I needed to rebase/redo majority of the patches, hence it
> was a bit difficult to split it up into a smaller parts that could be
> applied incrementally. But I'll try to improve this in the future, thanks!

Ah, you got me wrong. What I meant was: If these patches still need
changes or updates, don't send a new version of all the patches, but
rather send incremental fixes on top of these patches. Sometimes it
happens that you end up with 30+ patches, no worries.

> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=3D191802
> >=20
> > Is it obsolete by now?
> >=20
>=20
> To be honest, I don't know. The author never answered, guess he may
> reappear sometime in the future with a v2. Those patches need to be
> corrected and rebased.

Then, I will mark them as "Changes requested". Thanks for the heads up!

Regards,

   Wolfram


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=QISv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--