Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87lfglt6z1.fsf@igel.home> <mhng-847e71cf-64bc-464b-8d09-3bcec40aa491@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1>
In-Reply-To: <mhng-847e71cf-64bc-464b-8d09-3bcec40aa491@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1>
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 00:55:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRuQpwHvyZVjab+RMgx9BMR8gjcnGSgeP3a7L=dCcNqAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] riscv: Fixup static_obj() fail
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Cc:     Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
        Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
        Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 12:39 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:25:22 PDT (-0700), schwab@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> > On Sep 14 2020, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >> How should we proceed to get that fixed in time for 5.9? For the older
> >> branches where it has been backported (so far 5.7 and 5.8), should we
> >> just get that commit reverted instead?
> >
> > Why is this still broken?
>
> Sorry, I hadn't seen this.  I'm not seeing a boot failure on 5.9-rc8 with just
> CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCPOY=y in addition to defconfig (on QEMU, though I doubt
> that's relevant here).  It looks like the fix is to essentially revert this,
> which I'm fine with, but I'd prefer to have a failing test to make sure this
> doesn't break again.
>
> Guo: I don't see an actual patch (signed off and such) posted for this, do you
> mind posting one?  Otherwise I'll take a crack at constructing the revert
> myself.

Please have a look:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/1602002973-92934-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org/T/#u

The only revert couldn't solve the static_obj problem.

-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/