Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp523898pxu; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:05:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeFccj/xDxHAY8IKF+RnD/OsbSJR6+uOtiMHqfIRu8bfjWuvoNz2Gm8/0pDfV39ezZFzZW X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b45:: with SMTP id v5mr1028469ejg.353.1602011139021; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:05:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602011139; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UVaKGr1gxk6QUAPIgtTOjT8ccmUGA8bOmPX4HhY59hvV3esvm1IbZuXFx57w8ELvDL ZTW8x8akd7Oaop0kIKDKCIrA8V1za/roCflXD4WYFZNPTUJpMfTWAEgkkYt/A8ZrozwH oqmB48VxEgn/4sy0+XkjaLWswcFdKtdfh5TvmpVLcbAVvIDvHVXqs1wJNcxOojhClMbF A11axbwLeQuN+qxoRAf1c3tPI2gAcc8BtIW34bDqAEdIMzqLZsYK+IgXVp4qFQLGIm83 HVSmv5mftQDeyuG0CmGRGy6ejmmYDLkZPP3rpO+YDXKgTP27Ln3dySqlLFlPB0sBfpQ6 e8aQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=VmnXGrxjOiOKAzSdHhqX9qAXX8FAq0++oaD7wS5VrX0=; b=sDLbhfOd5hCqqaTi28lfTV0MGCzIsYRRutvG9ca9GJjl/b8ciq7w/FHE3j2sinDr12 WDNG5dq/qKgS9JwRq4u7stjyvpFEEOdMe4yWfQEZ0jr/qDmJEzMdmJc1Hv6ZdZuFqPCa tOuHRgeh3m22FGmeA2U2cVhzQlCnYKdmDCWspS1GPEFSMKLSBz4xv8eCGH+o/1CmQMHN 3HFxIHfEcChtbsTDTix/is3kerbtbln15laNZi0wRwLo49yllh92s8LixcRX6wY7Tzlu kGDep5kkLNLYRp2L8zlCT7Ktv6+KtyNT7baV1iQcwokegeKqoC1aj5FnKxFl9WL7ZlN2 8iJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r12si3388242edq.93.2020.10.06.12.05.15; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 12:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726899AbgJFTD1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:03:27 -0400 Received: from outbound-smtp24.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.192]:48364 "EHLO outbound-smtp24.blacknight.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726791AbgJFTD0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:03:26 -0400 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail01.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.10]) by outbound-smtp24.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3AA1C0C23 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 20:03:24 +0100 (IST) Received: (qmail 27506 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2020 19:03:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO techsingularity.net) (mgorman@techsingularity.net@[84.203.22.4]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 6 Oct 2020 19:03:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 20:03:22 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ACPI _CST introduced performance regresions on Haswll Message-ID: <20201006190322.GL3227@techsingularity.net> References: <20201006083639.GJ3227@techsingularity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 06:00:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > server systems") and enable-cst is the commit. It was not fixed by 5.6 or > > 5.9-rc8. A lot of bisections ended up here including kernel compilation, > > tbench, syscall entry/exit microbenchmark, hackbench, Java workloads etc. > > > > What I don't understand is why. The latencies for c-state exit states > > before and after the patch are both as follows > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state0/latency:0 > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state1/latency:2 > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state2/latency:10 > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state3/latency:33 > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state4/latency:133 > > > > Perf profiles did not show up anything interesting. A diff of > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state0/ before and after the patch > > showed up nothing interesting. Any idea why exactly this patch shows up > > as being hazardous on Haswell in particular? > > > Presumably, some of the idle states are disabled by default on the affected > machines. > > Can you check the disable and default_status attributes of each state before > and after the commit in question? > # grep . pre-cst/cpuidle/state*/disable pre-cst/cpuidle/state0/disable:0 pre-cst/cpuidle/state1/disable:0 pre-cst/cpuidle/state2/disable:0 pre-cst/cpuidle/state3/disable:0 pre-cst/cpuidle/state4/disable:0 # grep . enable-cst/cpuidle/state*/disable enable-cst/cpuidle/state0/disable:0 enable-cst/cpuidle/state1/disable:0 enable-cst/cpuidle/state2/disable:0 enable-cst/cpuidle/state3/disable:0 enable-cst/cpuidle/state4/disable:0 # grep . pre-cst/cpuidle/state*/default_status pre-cst/cpuidle/state0/default_status:enabled pre-cst/cpuidle/state1/default_status:enabled pre-cst/cpuidle/state2/default_status:enabled pre-cst/cpuidle/state3/default_status:enabled pre-cst/cpuidle/state4/default_status:enabled After the commit, the default_status file does not appear in /sys -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs