Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965087AbWHIGwx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:52:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965085AbWHIGww (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:52:52 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:34200 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965086AbWHIGww (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:52:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:47:17 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Lee Revell cc: Willy Tarreau , Alan Cox , Andi Kleen , Alexey Zaytsev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matti.aarnio@zmailer.org Subject: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list? In-Reply-To: <1155068717.26338.100.camel@mindpipe> Message-ID: References: <1155047956.5729.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060808191631.GF8776@1wt.eu> <1155068717.26338.100.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2090 Lines: 46 >> > Tag subject lines from non subscribes with [nonsub] and everyone can >> > then decide for themselves. >> >> This looks like a very clever yet simple idea (if easy to implement at all) ! >> While I have no anti-spam and am not annoyed at all by the low spam rate on >> LKML, I think this would make my cleaning operations even more effective. +1 >That would mean 8 fewer characters of useful information visible in the >subject line. For those who use a graphical client this should not be a problem, pixels are plenty. For 80x25 readers, well, I can only suggest to use an index listing optimized to your needs. For example, the default pine listing left too few space for the subject for me on LKML, so I changed it to be like (index-format=MSGNO STATUS SUBJECT FROM SMARTTIME SIZENARROW) 314 D | | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscri Andi Kleen Tue02pm (3K) 315 . | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscribe Alan Cox Tue03pm (3K) 316 . | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscri Willy Tarreau Tue09pm (3K) 317 . | |-Re: Time to forbid non-subsc Lee Revell Tue04pm (3K) 318 | |-Re: Time to forbid non-sub Kyle Moffett Tue05pm (3K) 319 N |-Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers David Miller Tue03pm (2K) Since a lot of mails are already prefixed with something [], like [PATCH], I do not really mind if there's [nonsub], or if you like to keep it short, you can make that [NSUB], and it even outperforms [PATCH] wrt. length. Then it would only take the key sequence ;ts[NSUB]adx to kill all the nonsub messages. However, I would also be fine with an extra header in the mail header saying "this comes from a non-subscriber", the key seq in pine would be slightly bigger though, ";thMajordomo-Infononsubadx". Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/