Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp637669pxu; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:47:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyL9k0dll44mK62tJIvfWervIgOMW9vW1/W3JmChpQ2VzVYG9ULzHj5cMj23d4lBQnGQQ6H X-Received: by 2002:a50:a143:: with SMTP id 61mr5106716edj.57.1602096435843; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602096435; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZGT7soqLxzHTmILoY0NO35gf085qDXRTzlPKBH9XjoP70tNW9hOAhRTl5V1b3tK4Ui OWBWPcK8tyaQtFXFqTV6W5FD6l2rFojVPYpoA+N2tNCAyTg0071p9SyhjrZ477sfWXlA ACW1mZH1Mx7cngMlsebAy7sxQso+MdAEn6Q+bHle5VULLK0Shfm/k63yLwKInwtsyMpz htjqeXmX0g3J3IO3I3fR4fC9eyws2aLQNRM4ri0wCZklsmj8FVhSSvWJYLOBfm9tLEXw rfoecHhbmuFGuPm2bhWyIbBD67B4kkIsb1s/T4pWtX+Vq98SKJgea/eSyCNoj9p0mRT1 Zh5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=YDpBXnJoTerx8+T5jAMHnGbQNOboeXlSHACsmk65W7I=; b=vtSyHwmWPhTxTaFvChAqnnx7yPrzznsWj3Wa3BUWkxNDQav1PXftud39D6Ws/wMekX N/QuQk4oG7TuVvGaL/uhclp0ubbitKTcJ5Z+ROL4q/2VQ60MH09+9g7btVYsv3bw8wqr IV1gJcz4FBtNU9tQnAZxrV3JKhT8sRYx18Rn2EWvEcTwBV9Mt9R9WnPHQ9I7temTCTTu qdOop2fcH3RggU7+n7U5jVzubP1gDriZHNOkWPJq3d4coJ5jaeDqq8gNZUtsN2ZEtFB0 ymR55MC3766pFnygsruisitKUmAKvUd27xcbjHqNoR6/pqbtNzswiq1LpYKdYQ5VdHyr NyPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=jfiLkb7t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pg3si2274278ejb.94.2020.10.07.11.46.52; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=jfiLkb7t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727697AbgJGSmc (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:42:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42964 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726323AbgJGSmc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:42:32 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc41.google.com (mail-oo1-xc41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBEEC061755 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc41.google.com with SMTP id w7so874062oow.7 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YDpBXnJoTerx8+T5jAMHnGbQNOboeXlSHACsmk65W7I=; b=jfiLkb7t0ApgrVp87Unp47OP6fC9a17SDr+nE37Ypa/GvxVr+yueHMScts1wKkBFQ7 vQpnp2mGKv7Ab5NA6hnC/fmPvoDSGTKmCh45AjAgqmNvZh6oZCCE4+xq1WLgziT41kgG SoogZQ962Rm7LHW23OTUIRciVSotap8BuMCcURUkDitJYqAGM2j6Xp+FIa1IKXNketk1 TL3wPf79DsgPKloaMtGiCUO6pPNIXVnY5D6ug+w7zI1slIrZDnVI+sAkPHWSN9Eu4Hkc e4qjyTbpvBDOo1clxIcBFy4N9pcvFODf76VnHx+w+4MF4MmiC67qwO251KMXTLBPvDGb s+Fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :reply-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YDpBXnJoTerx8+T5jAMHnGbQNOboeXlSHACsmk65W7I=; b=k7PgX3YXpdRIlhiWKxCXpWdnfRAcb8KyjQuoIUrLGEXX6sdwoIN4EaQk4j5nKJmGWV 0LDb0RFawa22FQ2YPFP5a10WFY+WOuX5micByAE2oSJqJqFaTCac9lv7V3EjEvep6cz1 iPEsnUcGlZS2OgkSQeCPyGCNlP+Z6e6mMP+X7ZWXIQI9WppxcdkV2YCj2+0e5amiXmyT gi/lhKX5XoqHbC2mmM2errCchzmK38A065/49giqBoRs+xiH7CcRG7F/CDjpOCaYoY4c IcA1A9rITGGkTcu9LdHtYOzXd46w+PZA+Kp87ilpCE1uwrhJWJGuErQT3CAQ1074oXsS ErAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wS8b3xRkniUybn1oJjerp0HxhslTu4J+hB+sIUWreQdyujCiG trrVN8Y7SQoEsgcUEGynZw== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:4301:: with SMTP id k1mr2906764ooj.92.1602096151671; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serve.minyard.net ([47.184.170.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t22sm2122070otk.24.2020.10.07.11.42.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Corey Minyard Received: from minyard.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b8f6:1b::80]) by serve.minyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40CE518003E; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 13:42:28 -0500 From: Corey Minyard To: "Boehme, Markus" Cc: "Park, Seongjae" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Nuernberger, Stefan" , "openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" , "Shah, Amit" Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 3/3] ipmi: Add timeout waiting for channel information Message-ID: <20201007184228.GH3038@minyard.net> Reply-To: minyard@acm.org References: <1599495937-10654-1-git-send-email-markubo@amazon.com> <1599495937-10654-3-git-send-email-markubo@amazon.com> <20200908003412.GD15602@minyard.net> <1599736120.29234.12.camel@amazon.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1599736120.29234.12.camel@amazon.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:08:40AM +0000, Boehme, Markus via Openipmi-developer wrote: > > > -                         && ipmi_version_minor(id) >= 5)) { > > > -             unsigned int set; > > > +     if (ipmi_version_major(id) == 1 && ipmi_version_minor(id) < 5) { > > This is incorrect, it will not correctly handle IPMI 0.x BMCs.  Yes, > > they exist. > > Interesting! I wasn't aware of those. Searching the web doesn't turn up > much and the spec doesn't mention them either. Are these pre-release > implementations of the IPMI 1.0 spec or some kind of "IPMI light"? There was an 0.9 version of the spec that some machines implemented. It's not really a "light" version, it's just a really early version. I don't know how many machine out there still implement it, but I try to keep them working if I can. Thanks, -corey > > Markus