Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:26:36 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, loic.pallardy@st.com,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] rpmsg: ns: Make Name service module transport
 agnostic
Message-ID: <20201007172636.GB575646@xps15>
References: <20200922001000.899956-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
 <20200922001000.899956-11-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
 <20200930071327.GG20683@ubuntu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200930071327.GG20683@ubuntu>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:13:27AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:10:00PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Make name service module transport agnostic by using the rpmsg
> > device specific byte conversion routine.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c | 10 ++++------
> >  include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h |  4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> > index b3318bf84433..1df3aaadfe10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> > @@ -18,9 +18,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
> >  	struct rpmsg_ns_msg *msg = data;
> >  	struct rpmsg_device *newch;
> >  	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
> > -	struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> > -	struct virtproc_info *vrp = vch->vrp;
> > -	struct device *dev = &vrp->vdev->dev;
> > +	struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> > @@ -38,13 +36,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
> >  
> >  	strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
> >  	chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> > -	chinfo.dst = virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->addr);
> > +	chinfo.dst = rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->addr);
> >  
> >  	dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n",
> > -		 virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> > +		 rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> >  		 "destroy" : "creat", msg->name, chinfo.dst);
> >  
> > -	if (virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> > +	if (rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> >  		ret = rpmsg_release_channel(rpdev, &chinfo);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h b/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> > index aabc6c3c0d6d..9f3030b2145b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> > @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ struct rpmsg_hdr {
> >   */
> >  struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
> >  	char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> > -	__virtio32 addr;
> > -	__virtio32 flags;
> > +	u32 addr;
> > +	u32 flags;
> 
> These aren't (necessarily) native endianness, right? Don't they deserve a 
> separate type? __rpmsg32?
> 

I kept them as u32 type to be as generic as possible and let the endianness
conversion callback do the work.  Making them a __rpmsg32 is a good idea, it
would force a proper implementation. 

> Thanks
> Guennadi
> 
> >  } __packed;
> >  
> >  /**
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> >