Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Tiger Lake PMC core driver fixes
To:     "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>, dvhart@infradead.org,
        andy@infradead.org, gayatri.kammela@intel.com
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20201006224702.12697-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <ad5c6d7c-351f-c1ee-7cab-6d3f083a10a1@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:12:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201006224702.12697-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 10/7/20 12:46 AM, David E. Box wrote:
> This patch set adds several critical fixes for intel_pmc_core driver.
> 
> Patch 1: Uses descriptive register names for the TigerLake low power
> 	 mode registers. Not critical, but was requested in review of
> 	 Patch 2.
> 
> Patch 2: Fixes the register mapping to the correct IPs in the power
> 	 gating status register for TigerLake.
> 
> Patch 3: Fixes the slps0 residency multiplier to use the correct, platform
> 	 specific values.
> 
> David E. Box (1):
>    platform/x86: pmc_core: Use descriptive names for LPM registers
> 
> Gayatri Kammela (2):
>    platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Fix TigerLake power gating status map
>    platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Fix the slp_s0 counter displayed value

Thank you for your patch-series, I've applied the series to my
review-hans branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Note it will show up there once I've pushed my local branch there,
which might take a while.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans