Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
References: <20201005145717.346020688@infradead.org> <20201005150922.458081448@infradead.org> <jhjpn5tn8mz.mognet@arm.com> <20201007210850.GQ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@linutronix.de, qais.yousef@arm.com, swood@redhat.com,
        juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vincent.donnefort@arm.com,
        tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 15/17] sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing
In-reply-to: <20201007210850.GQ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 07 Oct 2020 23:32:44 +0100
Message-ID: <jhjo8ldmzub.mognet@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk


On 07/10/20 22:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 08:22:44PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> +		struct task_struct *curr = class->peek_next_task(rq);
>
> If you look at the core-sched patches they have something very similar
> :-)

Shiny, there's the fair thing I chickened out of doing all prechewed!

I was trying very hard to forget about that series, seems like I did partly
succeed in that :)