Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201004162908.3216898-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
 <20201004162908.3216898-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <CACRpkdbscEpV6oP7q1AcbCcR-XUBG2PnnapQ695xug63VQ830w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbscEpV6oP7q1AcbCcR-XUBG2PnnapQ695xug63VQ830w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:45:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFBinCCNHXfit5FkkvgHSh4NdbunKBp3kw3okqTY6ohsK7zNzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] PCI: Add the IDs for Etron EJ168 and EJ188
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Linus,

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:14 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Martin Blumenstingl
> <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Add the vendor ID for Etron Technology, Inc. as well as the device IDs
> > for the two USB xHCI controllers EJ168 and EJ188.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>
> (...)
>
> >  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT           0x1b36
> >
> > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ETRON            0x1b6f
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ETRON_EJ168      0x7023
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ETRON_EJ188      0x7052
>
> If you're defining that here, I think it should also be
> removed in
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> by including this file instead?
you are absolutely right - I missed that part
I will change this in v2 - thanks for pointing it out!


Best regards,
Martin