Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp1231967pxu; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxY0YYo4O4R8gsYiVON03jPS4il5qhmFBnV8eYw1A52IKio3ihr5yj3dk37GcUe4dSOgp5f X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:14db:: with SMTP id y27mr9321774ejc.148.1602164470312; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602164470; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=v8yV3Tvu3l3eQq1+yLMF8KeLCswCp6VbiFB5hJ8JOn2OWJnJ4NXVB3MY6bi30QZgU9 U6xsW6eoflG0YYawvL9hzQ/7aZxQnzT8wzAT9Ieq9nK55tMQxKLUsaACqsXWbkhP++Hj cq4y628o83jmHHfXNWTy5BkmJb+Mrg6DDY/tBZWOWHXFkgIg9L8cx8muEN/wHpNeuZDB 7/3bT2LwNT6v2LFIY4LpjUygm4fHBzOjRpq5imxbop7L+zREWB7of+vojd3Gqaxisqv+ KUwmaaJdbjmgXuKVWh1AwZhKhImS3G7mwiTbZ9429T1347YTGtw20Z1R5O88XZQ02ZZ8 s5sA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=28gyQXNpF1DN/ygNYXtmZFhoYYiRhK+HkImKGmUzg8Q=; b=Ow/m+D5gIi6xcJfteErgKC0L6v+EBTa+bfMq1xwMg9uxG2m+o0ZKfQF1Sh2Xy3JaEO 6kPwVFQ+84F6Gu6QAWVhXmDnegdg3WyvxdR4LOv6IdAX5keKevnNM15yQCcAEslMPKwn OyJBXNeVjp3bu/bPUJ17RhWa173XsYK+inzqMXT0gvxVzScS2LSSunJaTRasfUHr8x0r x2h2IKGsa0YTB4pAPaF4E/u2igC88ircg3S9YeDd4SywmRy1JgiY3nIyFm6SyPO+Wkxs PEiWT9jAwrjh1mi+fmHyuFrk+FVyPQlFdb7PB4MJkYkIcDwtNXAMZmnBEp4JtcxTwFHj 5VXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Bydy+rx2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z9si4034236ede.431.2020.10.08.06.40.45; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Bydy+rx2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730361AbgJHNii (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:38:38 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:27275 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730356AbgJHNii (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:38:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602164316; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=28gyQXNpF1DN/ygNYXtmZFhoYYiRhK+HkImKGmUzg8Q=; b=Bydy+rx2uBgta/tBsYRPoBPhT454ponJVoWRdRgfoAETjmcuCTl4pUiCB759HasNNM37rU 0CfnSnd8Al97+/2ZRFpECSQb5J/MJcST60xvhUc0ZX5ztWB1t/UX2wHHRUHdJHeRRt278A kJNAiC8TWDes1bwwR4OpafTXSLWS/2M= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-145-IeMcRdowOPWe2kHBr4z2EQ-1; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:38:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: IeMcRdowOPWe2kHBr4z2EQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id c11so295242ejp.9 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:38:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=28gyQXNpF1DN/ygNYXtmZFhoYYiRhK+HkImKGmUzg8Q=; b=MKHk3jAcjRjFIUaOipe/YR2lurratAzKU2XJ0WBdHG/TWlGuYFtxo7vMO/ceAJLIAJ XEF+PoucRxGviZyQOfkbnTTWqnf4PA0VyTh93ZXEobj/tqQsz09ihPi8pneDjUIeZJkB opujbWW8kBs4F7PTVcX4JWNtxZbvwEMUj+bBZRMUG08l7jbHhzpqyLSXR8RnJzO3YIbI gopRUMsFWTLrusR3xU+ANak2Wv0LjYBdeSl3hux9KEGSTgvZiCUaEdcTVdAfOrFPNgQk oKW2nPGxdWJmdBpdlYnOfOWzE4yKCeFqT+fUkfCrorau1ury0YSACdqha3iCZ8nAHnRE 5HKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301KDM61HIw0xlCgT2gn9cUX3qiBzU2Z6+2Wu5GJr6yuyzY32KD +vflbyeX34ypQZNA5RgiFDD6VnE0a08u74rBRVW8Hl0MAt6iRbUB22+AiZU+fJuIPMR2y8Cy9pk jZqNSnS57v+xPhfR9C7lyJmdU X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2179:: with SMTP id rl25mr9090369ejb.450.1602164313976; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2179:: with SMTP id rl25mr9090339ejb.450.1602164313696; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1.localdomain (2001-1c00-0c0c-fe00-d2ea-f29d-118b-24dc.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c0c:fe00:d2ea:f29d:118b:24dc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm4208913ejt.52.2020.10.08.06.38.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/surface: Create a platform subdirectory for Microsoft Surface devices To: Maximilian Luz , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Darren Hart , Mark Gross , Mika Westerberg , Gayatri Kammela , Enric Balletbo i Serra , =?UTF-8?Q?Bla=c5=be_Hrastnik?= , Stephen Just , Dan Carpenter , Benjamin Tissoires , Chen Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20201005160307.39201-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: <389f3a38-83ca-dfcd-476a-61b1d33751bb@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:38:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 10/8/20 2:32 PM, Maximilian Luz wrote: > On 10/8/20 1:44 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Maximilian, >> >> On 10/5/20 6:03 PM, Maximilian Luz wrote: >>> As has come up in the discussion around >>> >>>    [RFC PATCH] Add support for Microsoft Surface System Aggregator Module >>> >>> it may make sense to add a Microsoft Surface specific platform >>> subdirectory. Andy has suggested drivers/platform/surface for that. >>> This series follows said suggestion and creates that subdirectory, as >>> well as moves Microsoft Surface related drivers over to it and updates >>> their MAINTAINERS entries (if available) accordingly. >>> >>> This series does not modify any existing driver code, symbols, or help >>> text. >> >> In case you do not know I'm taking over from any as >> drivers/platform/x86 maintainer. >> >> I'm fine with the concept of this series, but who is going to maintain >> this new drivers/platform/surface directory ? >> >> Ah I see that the first patch answers that question and the plan >> is to keep this part of the pdx86 maintainership. >> >> I would prefer for the new dir to have its own >> MAINTAINERS entry if I'm honest, I would like to try and >> split maintainership for the surface stuff as follows: >> >> 1. Who will review (and add their Reviewed-by or ask for improvements >>     or nack) patches to files in this dir? >> >> 2. Who will gather approved patches apply them to a for-next branch >>     and send them out to Linus during the merge Window? >> >> I can pick up 2. but I could really use some help with 1. So I >> was thinking having a separate MAINTAINERS entry for the new >> dir with you (Maximilian) (and me and Mark Gross) listed as >> MAINTAINERS; and then I'm hoping that you can do the review >> of surface related patches. At least those which you have not >> written yourself. >> >> How does that sound ? > > Sounds good, I'd be happy to help review and approve any Surface related > patches. However, I think it would be beneficial if you and Mark still > have a final look (and say) over the ones I've reviewed and accepted (if > that's not already a given). I feel like I may lack a bit of experience > for this job and might miss some things. Since Mark or I will be merging the patches we will indeed still take a look at them, but it helps if someone else has already done a review first. > I'll add the MAINTAINERS entry and send a v3 later today, if that's OK. That sounds good, thanks. Regards, Hans