Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:34:30 +0200
From: Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>
To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?
Message-ID: <20060809143429.GD5815@vanheusden.com>
References: <44D871DE.1040509@garzik.org>
	<MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKIECNNKAB.davids@webmaster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKIECNNKAB.davids@webmaster.com>
Organization: www.unixexpert.nl
Read-Receipt-To: <folkert@vanheusden.com>
Reply-By: Thu Aug 10 15:58:54 CEST 2006
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1156
Lines: 23

> > The kernel developers who need to keep the barrier to bug reports low
> > like the current policy.
> > Get a good spam filter, I only get 1-2 pieces a day in my LKML folder.
> 	How is everyone individually spam filtering better than one central spam
> filter? More likelihood that at least one relevent person will get the bug
> report? Certainly a single central spam filter can get more resources aimed
> at it to make sure it doesn't suppress anything important.

What about just using the spamhaus.org blocklist at vger? Stops quite a
bit of spam over here (http://keetweej.vanheusden.com/nspam_graph.png).


Folkert van Heusden

www.vanheusden.com/multitail - multitail is tail on steroids. multiple
               windows, filtering, coloring, anything you can think of
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/