Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:28:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:28:08 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:25095 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:27:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:27:31 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Larry McVoy Cc: Timur Tabi , Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Module Licensing? In-Reply-To: <20011031092228.J1506@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > > Since your program, which happens to consist of one open > > source part and one proprietary part, is partly a derived > > work from the kernel source (by using kernel header files > > and the inline functions in it) your whole work must be > > distributed under the GPL. > > This is obviously incorrect, that would say that > > #include > > means my app is now GPLed. Good luck enforcing that. You're right, just including won't do that, but either of: 1) using inline functions from a .h file or 2) linking to the library/kernel later on might mean your stuff is GPLed. Be careful which definitions you get from the header file, inline functions are a very grey area ;) regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/