Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 01:17:01 +0300
From:   Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: busses: Add support for atomic transfers in
 Actions Semi Owl driver
Message-ID: <20201008221701.GA72402@BV030612LT>
References: <b6c56858854805b0f03e29b7dde40b20796d5c93.1599561278.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
 <20200909151748.GA11397@mani>
 <20200909165915.GA387239@BV030612LT>
 <20200910030225.GA10495@mani>
 <20200910141223.GA447296@BV030612LT>
 <20200929194523.GE2010@kunai>
 <20200929210010.GB35053@BV030612LT>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200929210010.GB35053@BV030612LT>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mani, Wolfram,

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:00:10AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:45:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > Sure, I can handle this. I assume this should be a separate patch, to
> > > be applied before the current patch. Should I submit a patch series
> > > instead?
> > 
> > Yes, just do it. 
> 
> Sure, I have already clarified this directly with Mani and I'm going
> to handle it soon.

I have just submitted a patch series that incorporates the current
feedback (patches 1 & 2) and an additional improvement (patch 3):

  i2c: owl: Clear NACK and BUS error bits
  i2c: owl: Add support for atomic transfers
  i2c: owl: Enable asynchronous probing

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1602190168.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com/

Thanks,
Cristi