Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:32:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:31:55 -0500 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org ([204.107.140.52]:48651 "HELO twinlark.arctic.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:31:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:32:24 -0800 (PST) From: dean gaudet To: Larry McVoy cc: Rik van Riel , Timur Tabi , Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Module Licensing? In-Reply-To: <20011031092228.J1506@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-comment: visit http://arctic.org/~dean/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > > Since your program, which happens to consist of one open > > source part and one proprietary part, is partly a derived > > work from the kernel source (by using kernel header files > > and the inline functions in it) your whole work must be > > distributed under the GPL. > > This is obviously incorrect, that would say that > > #include > > means my app is now GPLed. Good luck enforcing that. glibc is GLPL ... not GPL ... -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/