Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:22:39 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker@suse.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] allow overriding default preempt mode from
 command line
Message-ID: <20201009132239.GP2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20201007120401.11200-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <20201009122926.29962-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <20201009125056.GN2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20201009130344.GN4967@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201009130344.GN4967@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 03:03:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 09-10-20 14:50:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Can you please not thread the new series onto the old one? That's some
> > seriously annoying behaviour that I see more and more... It makes me
> > loose whole patch-sets.
> 
> Sure, no problem. This is not really unusual in mm and I personally
> prefer to have discussion in a single thread rather than separated in
> two or more. But I definitely do not insist of course. It is surprising
> that you are losing the whole patchset as the threading seems to be done
> properly. Mutt doesn't seem to have problems with that.

I often sort by thread and date and look at the recent most threads.
Mutt sorts threads by first post, not most recent post, hence the thread
is 'lost'.

> Anyway, let me know if I should repost.

I've already broken the thread (#), no need to repost.