Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp2140105pxu; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBLDfhsDXqnh9gCJkmM6X8opNI0jWYR8/Pzkpm5tJg6wSEFPIDlEJfjhTZaQVbZ6gNercm X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce21:: with SMTP id sd1mr15344161ejb.4.1602258925810; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602258925; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TMRfllhHWylrBl5m8+uUT8wxaRuj0gkqOl+TAwTduns4cZ6AM3yLuuR1hWxGQKRiKL yeFZgpqHzXTUh+VD2SbVtXrUQT+l675zoBePrmbc58zs1A2aJnRfHlXjrkWtwq3tSVeO LvOEUILmKfQHEoqL+S3bQxrVs8AYSmvTdqt4smcMjVvPzDXD+zSOAieTgVOP4C2BjNDU dWYgrwcibaRByzAGR5pijij8PmfPgsAWiWv5froej2Hedm/Cl56niHEMj5N/Be05fhqK Nx5Mz7WFyX7r0VPlnupYTWPZGampiIwidlukAOYJCyPPFwxlmBd7LWENZuTuAHyr1JUk oyGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=vltLMdazGZD0TKhx4wvTNS2I9AVFeCizMmmyq36bP+8=; b=FnMfXQ4Roha7NuCDxqTBDgmDj2RMgJ3lpmLqXVwpC/DqzXtXgAe7K9W3oKCwNliihe l8UCb1J/KeUSVgVN4DAaZQUVcWtATspEQ4nUyMXR37e5TtXq0e/Kj8/WI7JSYl1Fyl94 udeMSh5Fd+ewIsO3KTh1W3F18AU+Xt+2V6PfsO+82/EBWGEvYByuEbGPQYSOXkXJcEMo OSzWgNtU7eeVyc3xNtDQoTuh7ZtOudhgQpo3HVTICnbexFBo/aATXjjvRqcADezWlsWj cRon1WwU1NENHMqNDw9dldt7WzahgvLYgMxgg6cFaFc+I4H1cNyUWUu4kUf4cBFB8UoO L1qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=rZiOE8gb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a20si7332207edn.39.2020.10.09.08.54.57; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=rZiOE8gb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389382AbgJIPxN (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:53:13 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50122 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388745AbgJIPxM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:53:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (170.sub-72-107-125.myvzw.com [72.107.125.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78CD72225D; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:53:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602258791; bh=c0Oco5+Y93BuKExeQgRVmoPcdBSWarHJTrDoTYOek08=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=rZiOE8gb5C44MTvAkf4Sx2DrcDm34ccnDEzGv+Wac8wQqBn8lCZTe0SJPkEjxSRQm NEKTobyHHPUUQg94/Y5MnMDhpqNqJul00KBsBORURG6vYFIU40j7MJ5JnTOGnc9KGK 1FTyMOoUk5M8VjVp4Z0DPx68NieX8md2/TBCyeFI= Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:53:10 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Sean V Kelley Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com, qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean V Kelley Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Message-ID: <20201009155310.GA3477892@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201002184735.1229220-1-seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote: > From: Sean V Kelley > > Changes since v7 [1]: > > - No functional changes. > > - Reword bridge patch. > - Noted testing below for #non-native/no RCEC case > (Jonathan Cameron) > > - Separate out pci_walk_bus() into pci_walk_bridge() change. > - Put remaining dev to bridge name changes in the separate patch from v7. > (Bjorn Helgaas) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930215820.1113353-1-seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org/ > > Root Complex Event Collectors (RCEC) provide support for terminating error > and PME messages from Root Complex Integrated Endpoints (RCiEPs). An RCEC > resides on a Bus in the Root Complex. Multiple RCECs can in fact reside on > a single bus. An RCEC will explicitly declare supported RCiEPs through the > Root Complex Endpoint Association Extended Capability. > > (See PCIe 5.0-1, sections 1.3.2.3 (RCiEP), and 7.9.10 (RCEC Ext. Cap.)) > > The kernel lacks handling for these RCECs and the error messages received > from their respective associated RCiEPs. More recently, a new CPU > interconnect, Compute eXpress Link (CXL) depends on RCEC capabilities for > purposes of error messaging from CXL 1.1 supported RCiEP devices. > > DocLink: https://www.computeexpresslink.org/ > > This use case is not limited to CXL. Existing hardware today includes > support for RCECs, such as the Denverton microserver product > family. Future hardware will be forthcoming. > > (See Intel Document, Order number: 33061-003US) > > So services such as AER or PME could be associated with an RCEC driver. > In the case of CXL, if an RCiEP (i.e., CXL 1.1 device) is associated with a > platform's RCEC it shall signal PME and AER error conditions through that > RCEC. > > Towards the above use cases, add the missing RCEC class and extend the > PCIe Root Port and service drivers to allow association of RCiEPs to their > respective parent RCEC and facilitate handling of terminating error and PME > messages. > > Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron #non-native/no RCEC > > > Jonathan Cameron (1): > PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs > > Qiuxu Zhuo (5): > PCI/RCEC: Add RCEC class code and extended capability > PCI/RCEC: Bind RCEC devices to the Root Port driver > PCI/AER: Apply function level reset to RCiEP on fatal error > PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR > PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support > > Sean V Kelley (8): > PCI/RCEC: Cache RCEC capabilities in pci_init_capabilities() > PCI/ERR: Rename reset_link() to reset_subordinate_device() > PCI/ERR: Use "bridge" for clarity in pcie_do_recovery() > PCI/ERR: Add pci_walk_bridge() to pcie_do_recovery() > PCI/ERR: Limit AER resets in pcie_do_recovery() > PCI/RCEC: Add pcie_link_rcec() to associate RCiEPs > PCI/AER: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC AER handling > PCI/PME: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC PME handling > > drivers/pci/pci.h | 25 ++++- > drivers/pci/pcie/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 36 ++++-- > drivers/pci/pcie/aer_inject.c | 5 +- > drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 109 +++++++++++++++---- > drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c | 15 ++- > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 8 +- > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 8 +- > drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 + > include/linux/pci.h | 5 + > include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 7 ++ > 13 files changed, 367 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c Thank you very much for your work and patience with this series! Applied to pci/err for v5.10 with the following changes: - Make pci_rcec_init() void since return value was unused. - Reorder pci_rcec_init() so rcec_ea is filled in before publishing in dev->rcec_ea. - Split pcie_do_recovery() patches up a little more. My hope was to make the "Use 'bridge' for clarity" patch more of a pure rename patch and easier to review. Not sure I accomplished that. - Log messages and uevents with "bridge", not "dev", in pcie_do_recovery() to preserve previous behavior. - Rename reset_subordinate_devices() to reset_subordinates() for brevity. - Fix kerneldoc issues (reported with "make W=1"). - Fix whitespace (lines didn't use the full width or > 80 columns, etc). Please let me know if I botched anything.