Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp2542771pxu; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:19:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXtr1fXABIyohLn7PV3d1GMz4qO8UVKqsZUUOZ5KcH/dlqKswZsOC2XYLM0uYpHTesI17Y X-Received: by 2002:a50:da84:: with SMTP id q4mr2764668edj.238.1602307186967; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:19:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602307186; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=guAwTBty1+ptoFTFkfiZo/xKPWCUeRo4+KQ7743HJYIZJiGY8WZRb6wjaP4ag0evJW Rom4QfCh0JYnOwBGZIZl8eSWG+o2eN3IMh72RekZHzxGtvgUn28W08FQtnIVYNHVP53p Ws0mB9mHb9yC9NnxFS+W6QoUrCjJ2RxMxBC1W9PTrAwtKnWrRlgyKt2wX++yDgSyP8Gs faMjc4SKxS59qrmkbtX1l/vvVWyRDhwZVND2OcoUU8YkHyRuEkBiz5fCwBst14aIkNU0 tYufOBrEvotB6pqxoCqr6Y+6cNgKcw27qd8GUejM6D3Gg5/lOkZWVziDefGRq+mAKjal xy8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=lAjWevq6JKtTg61JvrlVJHDU3hNJaqyC7HkqJ0Hrrhk=; b=yFFiiDrO0WWhm7rdI84qoTWtjXOFoOkPl0HbjBM9xp5JmFtIRNOC16eC+GDLqJvX1R cbjAGoPvrDpdFOZqYwOeHSNHKjHx8LnOh6LruoK+UT1G6yOZi4In/a4zRwkwBobLjO6s oW5ZC3BKHy7Q6sYCNk1+n/8YwtOKZbLnrHYVr5lYXf2IBi0XQxW20tLG9jrdeavwCK/Y Ifne7zd8RF3IXsOSSRpxCTdFoD/weBCL9wM2daDTlH8/Hh0Nc4kpGc3D5W055mGg+I6X x0pTkFyFvbdccwBDyZVMd60qNS46Msppj8/M7oYQxWXR4FHL99sc+cJ3wmeLCn5cGqVY JFHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s16si3281492ejy.687.2020.10.09.22.19.23; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387785AbgJIV7O (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 17:59:14 -0400 Received: from kvm5.telegraphics.com.au ([98.124.60.144]:38688 "EHLO kvm5.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733201AbgJIV7O (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 17:59:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kvm5.telegraphics.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AFB29EB2; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 17:59:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:59:03 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Laurent Vivier cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Roman Zippel , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Philip Blundell , Joshua Thompson , Sam Creasey Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused mach_max_dma_address In-Reply-To: <20201009095621.833192-1-laurent@vivier.eu> Message-ID: References: <20201009095621.833192-1-laurent@vivier.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Oct 2020, Laurent Vivier wrote: > This information is unused since the discontinuous memory support > has been introduced in 2007. > > Fixes: 12d810c1b8c2 ("m68k: discontinuous memory support") Does this qualify as a bug fix?