Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp3476842pxu; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:04:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxegroHCV+IpUa+3QtIch++AtmCONRafGWawVcP5NzSJDlHa6kmK4o7N8LOPFYMnJCVJy77 X-Received: by 2002:a50:8fa3:: with SMTP id y32mr10468177edy.78.1602439476204; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602439476; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NfF8PWLRqj9sH7LAz+CKKNVFhzCceowZhkGqfqwJTCTc/e7zZ/Bpkbq1aZ69l2HPlT IPmxb9y569F+z0hpNpdTmXmrN1bMzm7bR8uJzflkBGRKD9dXG1qmGWEecFuD6ppDI4qd TeyJ1wphWiTxC6AfXYUsf4/YX4G0T1smB5esqT957Kn+uo7S/zPVVqQR0v/KjrEzpddv 3jGfKW7UuRFJYRNT9Q43wWp+vAKc1LOVq7Na7WIvc17Z8Yw6sSTUMC61WHxMx0YsDe5u 8A3VtkFVTPDT29plHA/LMlWzb7enD8dRuBzkiH9SVlFB3w8Wz2eN1uwvjNFIc00Gxk9M oHzw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :references:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Im0lUeDIiQjj7jSnjc98b8gOsFN2MEnCb5RRaDRURnY=; b=D5r7BGhIc+jiw3ruWHzGVMQsgahM3tgNEcbFhiaQqgZb/ZslBsh9O11i6n38JA8JqQ KrsJMf3h13FbrL6nPqeG82xW88S0+FYjxrMDZtAo5B+TV5tCt3B839RmQJZd0/8zRGLa YlQr7Jot+6BHCh2ejLfmLRLRT7FwcnUIiLUY/SX1iuVP82CxqTSNX21SurXq3pxCV9Lb zmUJRiW6tHyXbYpCAQdxq8PI65YHTTWNU5BjVH75COnhpXIq0SW5pWJQdvOaMkIZDlgZ Qm11t9uw8oD2yNPvLdy7qsLcNqZoo/2NtbuZc2aF1yW2G4UIl/m+CSkxTd07rM0qqYcy Wzzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f16si10392925edt.266.2020.10.11.11.04.13; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387755AbgJKMPe (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:15:34 -0400 Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([37.24.231.21]:59692 "EHLO albireo.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387410AbgJKMPe (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:15:34 -0400 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1kRaFy-0007Zg-Qw; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 12:15:18 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kRaFy-0004Bc-OA; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:15:18 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , "Phillips\, Kim" , Mark Rutland , Masami Hiramatsu Subject: Re: Additional debug info to aid cacheline analysis References: <20201006131703.GR2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20201008070231.GS2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <50338de81b34031db8637337f08b89b588476211.camel@klomp.org> <20201008212259.gdhlwdswn5pu4zos@two.firstfloor.org> <20201010205836.GA2666@wildebeest.org> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:15:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20201010205836.GA2666@wildebeest.org> (Mark Wielaard's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 2020 22:58:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7r1x8kp.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mark Wielaard: > Yes, that would work. I don't know what the lowest supported GCC > version is, but technically it was definitely fixed in 4.10.0, 4.8.4 > and 4.9.2. And various distros would probably have backported the > fix. But checking for 5.0+ would certainly give you a good version. > > How about the attached? Would it be possible to test for the actual presence of the bug, using -fcompare-debug? (But it seems to me that the treatment of this particular compiler bug is an outlier: other equally tricky bugs do not receive this kind of attention.)