Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp3477836pxu; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:06:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzO+1Om0gGuGEnwmgPB3seLyeZDuP22yOM/gtT3rpDAa1Ks3XoE4+PgFvTBruWIfafp3+iT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:edb0:: with SMTP id sa16mr24237887ejb.327.1602439606507; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:06:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602439606; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P7ekxnYvBlAgk3wFraDidV2R28LDl/p6c0nDgz8iTd/jpBU+BT7WtqVLZeMnAvB51i h2Gk4P9eBU15yB+M4m6P9xnJqrSbGKg1ASU50LEuSuoqVW3M/MUxwlGPfNbhOUOcNSg+ 1I+xUp32j2+K8Tf40tDM19C7LGZg4efaDRwYbNUF/cMU0yMHEmCpwtsZdEpvInQEyi0w qWf/7kqIHDSrvG678ElIoMtI6gf9nGaMy+z/KcxkUQzxnh3wwbGQLbcumAaoCeBSoO4Y HDHzNOs6YTlyaMe/IS/5XYJ4Epc3MNXrlKcLb6pXP6hpj2R+DsROkPLzEFNu05KqXOKA NJnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=8t+tfvseSxYzO2RKqsj/yqqM5EnZrJDTKlRFf66tMxc=; b=BESExsoK40kSlr14FNrq4RrUsl3CWQ5hro3gcL9uVlOzp6xbkNoQvbjvpOqAV95Yb8 urm3Im2l1fQ/3HCj0PSiPPhMuUUNxwoc1dDkYxMKHeybAKXmTMltAdC5+YoS8Zia4fVd N1iPNUtnSz4g3j4is3E+O/DoNM/JMHxueEsttdo/yMAuYiBzpnrevuwjWnCAeGYyLZkL 40Vk9+5wGAXVnKKBRTB8uDLLS4oqNBtzAxE4UYSyxm+3A+jPvTatWm81dZPlhkDACojZ sEI/7RK4Hvd4+H/jD+Efb61EtafH1/tlTvMMjG6YQ7+4y5/BxAvP6YXL/VQYFd7if277 k8Bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lu17si10591710ejb.24.2020.10.11.11.06.23; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387790AbgJKMYb (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:24:31 -0400 Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl ([212.238.236.112]:55642 "EHLO gnu.wildebeest.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387744AbgJKMYa (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:24:30 -0400 Received: from librem (deer0x15.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EE5530291AC; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by librem (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 783EAC1BBF; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:23:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:23:36 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Florian Weimer Cc: Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , "Phillips, Kim" , Mark Rutland , Masami Hiramatsu Subject: Re: Additional debug info to aid cacheline analysis Message-ID: <20201011122336.GC2666@wildebeest.org> References: <20201006131703.GR2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20201008070231.GS2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <50338de81b34031db8637337f08b89b588476211.camel@klomp.org> <20201008212259.gdhlwdswn5pu4zos@two.firstfloor.org> <20201010205836.GA2666@wildebeest.org> <87h7r1x8kp.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7r1x8kp.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on gnu.wildebeest.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Mark Wielaard: > > > Yes, that would work. I don't know what the lowest supported GCC > > version is, but technically it was definitely fixed in 4.10.0, 4.8.4 > > and 4.9.2. And various distros would probably have backported the > > fix. But checking for 5.0+ would certainly give you a good version. > > > > How about the attached? > > Would it be possible to test for the actual presence of the bug, using > -fcompare-debug? Yes, that was discussed in the original commit message, but it was decided that disabling it unconditionaly was easier. See commit 2062afb4f. Cheers, Mark