Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161012AbWHJEWo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161018AbWHJEWo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:44 -0400 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:4062 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161012AbWHJEWn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:16 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Matt Mackall Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Joern Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack Message-ID: <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200608091815.k79IFQVB005310@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 826 Lines: 22 On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. > > Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining > Voyager users proper computers? Yeah, that's a plan :-) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/