Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp3907086pxu; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:40:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxB8xL3fgOKXD+aOhuna7eJSF20uKIIwye4yLR0fPkb1b37Ti2YWmWuI69aPKE3viLD2LXS X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c90a:: with SMTP id b10mr13884623edt.163.1602502811249; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:40:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602502811; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ChqTZg1WIeCn2PToMSWpj0HBBuO9MXTMJaNt8gRwWDg/+CorriaJnBaXOTGWfSYYhP Nj86/opaT28q4suTYX4zMLzVeKeJpIoD0BB76RNlCDs6z3XZAfWM3VisZLCJUbXhIjB9 zsc5Zxo6kem+6Ts+m0BocwYcf1iyxYSAqCHbnuI39VGbQ/dzKSVCW5UGkAwSv0z/GU46 WKLTA97iPMnn/9pEl0pngQe5r7PH0rN70LBlVIJmRhkI8N2zhnf+jD+FbSPgdOYyJQnS j6iog8McaWRLoTLpzodML3ZPuWWda97lUVCddGnMPH/a9h1ZMFBNEd9JGQ0zeaPlyRDd Um9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=s/PkAIMey0kXTzsjXUuFsQK44M0HC6dIjB+P346jPW8=; b=L845H5h9IBYMncJ5Q4mk+zCkFRNu6PCu1LJworXpoBpJRhAuNb9lLcgRxIeatAL3Ix kWe0Hb4OuucZ/FTN1rydCWYvPkXebbhrp8NjJbxB/kqEpqFlx8bX96e/TFQDTzKsWEfh gnGtI+NVz9pcMm8qXfaMPZD9UeDIVrljji7BZZobD5NiV693ckDZqjNKFZEawuvgABbd YuqnWh7xubrrKFhHo3KrRYu9OtJWy6IEiRsV2pv3Suw3Zf9TuYrDjhY6d4Y0LhjkOrmo b/t60GTF+D4kmG/UDeF9uybUPo2fce5oa1nhne3zP40zBsWtNCTeMeJUBGaYUMdqcCfH xaaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y8si15933021edw.401.2020.10.12.04.39.48; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388245AbgJLLiA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:38:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55612 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388239AbgJLLhx (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 07:37:53 -0400 Received: from gaia (unknown [95.149.105.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 196EE206E5; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:37:48 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, ardb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: mm: Move zone_dma_bits initialization into zone_sizes_init() Message-ID: <20201012113748.GE9844@gaia> References: <20201010151235.20585-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <20201010151235.20585-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201010151235.20585-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 05:12:31PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index f6902a2b4ea6..0eca5865dcb1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -196,14 +196,16 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max) > unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0}; > > #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA > + zone_dma_bits = ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS; > + > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) { > extern unsigned int acpi_iort_get_zone_dma_size(void); > > zone_dma_bits = min(zone_dma_bits, > acpi_iort_get_zone_dma_size()); > - arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(zone_dma_bits); > } > > + arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(zone_dma_bits); > max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit); > #endif > #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 > @@ -394,11 +396,6 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) > > early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem(); > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) { > - zone_dma_bits = ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS; > - arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS); > - } arm64_dma_phys_limit is used by memblock_alloc_low() (via ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT). I think it's too late to leave its initialisation to zone_sizes_init(). -- Catalin