Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:37:24 +0200
From:   Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To:     Arun Easi <aeasi@marvell.com>
Cc:     Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qla2xxx: Return EBUSY on fcport deletion
Message-ID: <20201012163724.jozj3t3kjxty2pb2@beryllium.lan>
References: <20201012091100.55305-1-dwagner@suse.de>
 <alpine.LRH.2.21.9999.2010120904230.28578@irv1user01.caveonetworks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.9999.2010120904230.28578@irv1user01.caveonetworks.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:07:15AM -0700, Arun Easi wrote:
> This does not appear to be cut against the latest for-next/staging; "rval" 
> is not used there for the initial set of returns.

Indeed, forgot to use staging. It's against queue. Let me update it.

> Anyway, returning EBUSY is the right way to go.

Thanks for the confirmation.

Daniel