Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:18:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-sched: add comment about
 find_tt() not returning error
Message-ID: <20201012151816.GA1559916@kroah.com>
References: <20201011205008.24369-1-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010121550300.6487@felia>
 <20201012145710.GA631710@rowland.harvard.edu>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010121659040.6487@felia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010121659040.6487@felia>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> And for the static analysis finding, we need to find a way to ignore this 
> finding without simply ignoring all findings or new findings that just 
> look very similar to the original finding, but which are valid.

Then I suggest you fix the tool that "flagged" this, surely this is not
the only thing it detected with a test like this, right?

What tool reported this?

thanks,

greg k-h