Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:44:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:43:52 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:47116 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:43:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:44:04 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Larry McVoy Cc: Timur Tabi , Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Module Licensing? In-Reply-To: <20011031103443.K1506@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > I think another way to look at it might be: if you extend a GPLed > program using well defined interfaces, you can probably get away with > not GPLing your code. > On the other hand, if you're in there changing how an existing GPLed > program works, and there isn't any way to pull your stuff out cleanly, > then you are definitely stuck with the GPL. And that's as it should > be, you are in GPLed code. Fully agreed. From what I read, Timur is somewhere halfway between these points and I'm not sure he can get away with not GPLing his work the way he does things now... regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/