Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:55:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:55:23 -0500 Received: from [63.231.122.81] ([63.231.122.81]:10345 "EHLO lynx.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:55:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:53:57 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger To: Rik van Riel Cc: Larry McVoy , Timur Tabi , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Module Licensing? Message-ID: <20011031115357.J16554@lynx.no> Mail-Followup-To: Rik van Riel , Larry McVoy , Timur Tabi , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011031103443.K1506@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:44:04PM -0200 X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > I think another way to look at it might be: if you extend a GPLed > program using well defined interfaces, you can probably get away with > not GPLing your code. I imagine the question then arises to whether even the "EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL" interfaces fall under the definition of a well-defined interface. I suppose (IANAL) that the "intent" of the author in marking this interface as GPL-only has some impact on the discussion? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/