Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161404AbWHJQLL (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:11:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161419AbWHJQLK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:11:10 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:41957 "EHLO palinux.external.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161415AbWHJQLI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:11:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:11:07 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Xin Zhao Cc: Neil Brown , linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Urgent help needed on an NFS question, please help!!! Message-ID: <20060810161107.GC4379@parisc-linux.org> References: <4ae3c140608092204n1c07152k52010a10e209bb77@mail.gmail.com> <17626.49136.384370.284757@cse.unsw.edu.au> <4ae3c140608092254k62dce9at2e8cdcc9ae7a6d9f@mail.gmail.com> <17626.52269.828274.831029@cse.unsw.edu.au> <4ae3c140608100815p57c0378kfd316a482738ee83@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ae3c140608100815p57c0378kfd316a482738ee83@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1239 Lines: 32 On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:15:57AM -0400, Xin Zhao wrote: > I am considering another possibility: suppose client C1 does lookup() > on file X and gets a file handle, which include inode number, > generation number and parent's inode number. Before C1 issues > getattr(), C2 move the parent directory to a different place, which > will not change the parent's inode number, neither the file X's inode, > i_generation. So when C1 issues a getattr() request with this file > handle, the server seems to have no way to detect that file X is not > existent at the original path. Instead, the server will returns the > moved X's attributes, which are correct, but semantically wrong. Is > there any way that server deal with this problem? It isn't semantically wrong. There is no way for the application to distinguish between the events: open() stat() mv and open() mv stat() As long as the results are consistent with the former case, it doesn't matter if the latter case actually happened. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/