Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp5027081pxu; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuZdUkhtM2iUxDTkKRHBJzpl/bgB8GRSeX+nC9lWUASpK2yD+UiQ9eVZoc42fIsXCWWOiA X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d992:: with SMTP id u18mr1302799eds.284.1602618753189; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602618753; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ek/aAwyi9wXq5JQfz7LY0R9lzvVG1ANCi5Q9w6XLkDFQRZ13yEv8DwwcHoh0E8S3Te tvXeSP52TWX19v5VyBga4+jpTm1HUS7QiGv8vndLRhPDRbfYKwY4qrSs3uNMZvkxXlVJ cSSj9oY2SokI1qLm5lWyg/GQmUpjBX6opaiNvVMHTC8fk5rkV/qX0aVfvNYN/uGAQOJu Fbjml2xhv/e9zLm4X6QdzoQBuu04T/LPjstuJaYuGyH5n9s7Or9/OVTxV9tuYwmAmTHo mzJC7xW+mTj15t5bnTrcOCUYVMnhIICMexWYe06YlQX0t+z5U8W0cPwgAlSgDy2ty5OQ +MAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=azTn4fYcsb9QgmJPQAawTDMXTsFjwMYD7ZRewOEzXFg=; b=MV93+QXXj+CPeMKpJ/fspi7S79V3hwuz7T1X185VrsdGYDZbliGHfrSQUDU4bpAjNP hDcEat8s8p09C8a5PzTgYLaNr61Hv9MEErLKud0HEGHlbuTwvENulJNpiqIKI4lvkJb+ xEGZo0J3P+YqCG7WLyFYqVg7UW7XncU5+13wxmZc7WK9enCBCOSvS5D769Qu2ngto+Te iLcsTqcqF/oURgiDrqEHIPOVslyDU8AlfXwefHSdTDvadvT3cwwGpdqakjrCHZeG7PyM ECaX4oL8NjspnmlnFWM2P6tj7iOQLSnxXkRuYNwQgIluNK7rB4a1sKuI1wn7aQzayEHf /3vQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b="Kg8ID8/a"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si519327edw.305.2020.10.13.12.52.09; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b="Kg8ID8/a"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732742AbgJMTtE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:49:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57158 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728114AbgJMTtE (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:49:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com (mail-pj1-x1042.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5F5C0613D2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id p21so14144pju.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=azTn4fYcsb9QgmJPQAawTDMXTsFjwMYD7ZRewOEzXFg=; b=Kg8ID8/atBL055e7IqeqHlAqWENd7rNwLnXooxfy359cXJDa8cbp0TpbYDmad/tgp/ PpyR548BF95scSSOUHfrtd7AkbrYUM5/k55hu6OU7fNJuhu37A8AZs5xXO3jX+v6oWzo DZwyacrlj6RnKy0nnURgicNZqLXEMa1h+LDTe/EipksZmPR2tvhwqrZ+iuRNhFMIurLf 4O/ScMT/gMl7PA5GZIXV6VAsl6bqxaz+BGzVDyfgNojF7XMu7Qt0d309H9lgElZY+jRx b3inkZuY+9ARcKcTeTcogzR++R/eUpWt5vKGr5LCUDo2gN3AvLvK39/OVtE8TRBgb14H HqWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=azTn4fYcsb9QgmJPQAawTDMXTsFjwMYD7ZRewOEzXFg=; b=PCmBpVdBMPzb0aKaJ9dH+agmWn/RX7D2qDb7q0O3ywtuqWq6yDZgH4PeJirkeRkfN0 8s2cGTdXLneLQaZmnX2yw5bDa86WIUhEikfzdu6DN+6XXWr6NcyDK517eLfCygJR8wFp Sbq9Zi3O6f1ZXeLc4uC+CEEUSdRJl7fhmEe0CTD54QAh7iD/9b+8pEyCyMLoOv44At4G 4nOV04ABLgOPx5unOVmCvEMJnB3L8B/wEWrtB5GIwCt1w++PamDUfj9GNBgg1iC7zTzJ 3RHWaQHtG2Qaf2EJwxFCf/hVblmbyjMDPhrMlDAptv8hyWK3kC92ADnzcBICWq/mtbea UeJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531B/8iW/rFaZ7ZmajLpco3LqnW+CCTtYixZnJLw2ip86keu0IGt s7iyM+w2tG0hGRlIlb5ztA08BGdGMBXXrxCe X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c14:b029:d4:d894:7eed with SMTP id x20-20020a1709027c14b02900d4d8947eedmr1042992pll.81.1602618542661; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([66.219.217.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u27sm462035pgm.60.2020.10.13.12.49.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.10-rc1 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: io-uring , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <36a6706d-73e1-64e7-f1f8-8f5ef246d3ea@kernel.dk> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:49:01 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/13/20 1:46 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:46 AM Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> Here are the io_uring updates for 5.10. > > Very strange. My clang build gives a warning I've never seen before: > > /tmp/io_uring-dd40c4.s:26476: Warning: ignoring changed section > attributes for .data..read_mostly > > and looking at what clang generates for the *.s file, it seems to be > the "section" line in: > > .type io_op_defs,@object # @io_op_defs > .section .data..read_mostly,"a",@progbits > .p2align 4 > > I think it's the combination of "const" and "__read_mostly". > > I think the warning is sensible: how can a piece of data be both > "const" and "__read_mostly"? If it's "const", then it's not "mostly" > read - it had better be _always_ read. > > I'm letting it go, and I've pulled this (gcc doesn't complain), but > please have a look. Huh weird, I'll take a look. FWIW, the construct isn't unique across the kernel. What clang are you using? -- Jens Axboe