Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:16:10 +0100 (BST)
From:   "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
To:     Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add set_memory_node()
In-Reply-To: <1602559183-12225-1-git-send-email-hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2010132110060.866917@eddie.linux-mips.org>
References: <1602559183-12225-1-git-send-email-hejinyang@loongson.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Jinyang He wrote:

> Commit e7ae8d174eec ("MIPS: replace add_memory_region with memblock")
> replaced add_memory_region(, , BOOT_MEM_RAM) with memblock_add(). But
> it doesn't work well on some platforms which have NUMA like Loongson64.

 Please note this is not a full review, I haven't investigated the fitness 
for purpose of this change and instead just addressed one aspect of coding 
style.

> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h
> index aa03b12..29e2d9c 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/bootinfo.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ extern unsigned long mips_machtype;
>  
>  extern void detect_memory_region(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t sz_min,  phys_addr_t sz_max);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +extern void set_memory_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size);
> +#endif
> +

 If anything this needs to be:

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern void set_memory_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size);
#else
static inline void set_memory_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size) {}
#endif

so as to avoid #ifdef clutter across call places.

  Maciej