Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:47:45 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -v2] x86/asm updates for v5.10
Message-ID: <20201013204745.GL32151@zn.tnic>
References: <20201012110557.GK25311@zn.tnic>
 <20201013094149.GA32151@zn.tnic>
 <CAHk-=wjAQd22+EWBL6TzmOJom_H2TjU5AAOT+ZkxjW3kbYymcQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjAQd22+EWBL6TzmOJom_H2TjU5AAOT+ZkxjW3kbYymcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:39:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Actually, I think you forgot to push out the updated thing, I still
> see the same contents of the pull.

Blergh, that tag is still pointing to the old branch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/tag/?h=x86_asm_for_v5.10

even though I wrote a new one and pushed it. Otherwise I wouldnt've been
able to create the v2 pull request message.

However, I used the same tag name and force-pushed and perhaps there it
didn't do what I wanted it to do. Sorry about that - I'll recheck stuff
like that in the future.

> Which I guess is ok, since Uros has convinced me that the xorl
> conversion is safe even for the byte cases.
> 
> So I've pulled that unmodified branch.

Aha, ok, sounds good too.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
--