Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp621934pxu; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkt1o8aM1aWHYjpE3sydO4hOa7y7rSwdIglrmd02wIIBy1Cu11zLUgBwHVEuN3PFqLZC7o X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:11d3:: with SMTP id o19mr5986187eja.287.1602692922207; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602692922; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FkD6a8vj0USNkCuLUtn+O2ZiJYgaWmQ1lT6nwZ9TuiBy3e3yPfs/C8WSTKON++zPDU mWG/NDrjhYNeNBiNQOhEhEzY4IqL0c63qHCE5z8axnw5McbiS4f7eOK0tfDx4iysCxrF HHcMgVR1lngEtz+RkTrohIVCWWyPo38kraflScbxzDdQJXW5YmenvhDfEbRUoKyL6mIL Kq+OzWCYVybu9pYA7kZ196hdQix7myLX61J1bMBdXxkMWMcfGm1dYUDAmir0Qpwy6JW0 JsTFbc/V/+d8QfDtVxYAecxr1TsrCeyfb9F/B8JugljKg6c8d1Qnj1DNS4TvWN8g53pF brzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=FIhDjXs1JtBK7iQQCUSPTI+zqi7AJ4fFKJQTlDCTLcM=; b=o6Yrc28OHP/kFfi7mb3D4cBdlUvruG3rj5EU1OqdeYMui5yKxbPaRBzuRnljXA5wFi H+b7lahKdn3KquBCD9guU1Y62O3fipk+Xun41vX7rPsjljpUEXD2Gyt9Db4M6e1uOr9+ 702BTtkELRsRDd5M/ggzyXadi0CsvzdLlkJcuhHccuXxdQH1i5VrVZy5bp0bSDcQEwRd 1r/Jv1bliOJudzDY6H0O4yZV2oLQ9auwBGUOhBPf78qTfSL8WZpQ7E4uAMz7uAkH+g4V VjmTz+cf4sk7e1KRlMTXfvikYJwMiaiGCOt0VyS5hyId5ZmV7MQKDPYsz/P+rzQPNqYC qKOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s10si134046ejd.9.2020.10.14.09.28.18; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730647AbgJNM66 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:58:58 -0400 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:35751 "EHLO relay12.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727187AbgJNM66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:58:58 -0400 Received: from xps13 (unknown [91.224.148.103]) (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B936D200013; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:58:46 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Florian Fainelli , Jim Quinlan , Stephen Rothwell , abhimanyu.saini@nxp.com, Ioana Ciornei , Naresh Kamboju , Joerg Roedel , Robin Murphy , Poonam Aggrwal , Rob Herring , Joerg Roedel , Arnd Bergmann , Richard Weinberger , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux-Next Mailing List , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Suram Suram , masonccyang@mxic.com.tw, Will Deacon , "Z.Q. Hou" , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: arm-smmu 5000000.iommu: Cannot accommodate DMA offset for IOMMU page tables Message-ID: <20201014145846.613977d5@xps13> In-Reply-To: References: <20200924090349.GF27174@8bytes.org> <20200924092546.GJ27174@8bytes.org> <20200924095629.GL27174@8bytes.org> <20201011055258.22337d66@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Fabio Estevam wrote on Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:28:49 -0300: > Hi Florian, > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 6:59 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > however the NAND warning still remains. Someone else familiar with these > > NXP development boards should fix the DTS so as to provide the require > > ECC strength property. > > The ECC NAND warning looks like a regression. > > I had originally reported it for an imx27 board and now I also pointed > out that it also affects Layerscape: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20201013193652.0c535c7c@xps13/T/#m09fad7eacdf86aee0834bbd8863d6d5ee2e69f8c I think this thread initially reported two distinct defects, one has been solved, the second one is in my hands but I couldn't find the root cause yet. I tried to reproduce, without luck, with another NAND controller. If someone has an imx based board and a NAND controller on it, I would appreciate some help. Thanks, Miquèl