Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750830AbWHJTp0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:45:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751456AbWHJTpE (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:45:04 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:16060 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751484AbWHJToo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:44:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=KOtz1uXU65wdJV+UE9uw8TRxLkk5kB0fx3J50mHEw6WX6Qd3luK5PDYIfOv4MueGBBrT6J3Z2853JXdMJ82P5DOwPq4LPDYQSaQ7l0G51nLsRAtcmZkgdd1jooUsEZgc758t8MCnuFSjkEq5n+tefyVkUEv7s9xVa05kTGpGDlw= Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:44:40 +0400 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Andrew Morton , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string Message-ID: <20060810194440.GA6845@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <1155172843.3161.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060809234019.c8a730e3.akpm@osdl.org> <20060810191747.GL20581@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060810191747.GL20581@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 852 Lines: 25 On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:17:47PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:40:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:20:43 -0700 > > Mingming Cao wrote: > > > > > Define SECTOR_FMT to print sector_t in proper format > > > > We've thus-far avoided doing this. In fact a similar construct in > > device-mapper was recently removed. > > Yeah, OCFS2 had similar formats, and we were asked to change > them to naked casts before inclusion. Seems quite consistent with the > rest of the kernel. Will printk("%S", sector_t); kill at least one kitten? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/