Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201007130750.49349844@gandalf.local.home> <20201012101208.GF1099489@krava>
 <20201012111950.55a73588@gandalf.local.home> <20201012184120.GN13697@suse.de>
 <20201012151732.6e439886@gandalf.local.home> <CAHnb8o61XwvgkMnryaOv-=qCDf-o5OpezQAAk-44R+KgCc8Vcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201013090228.78256290@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20201013090228.78256290@gandalf.local.home>
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:08:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CADVatmM2hsbZ64Zr=5KES-iPyoxicmm+zkvxTZMq49eWQ390yw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtraceevent.git
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Zamir SUN <sztsian@gmail.com>, Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        "Ziqian SUN (Zamir)" <zsun@redhat.com>,
        Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>,
        Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tstoyanov@vmware.com>,
        Yordan Karadzhov <ykaradzhov@vmware.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
        Al Stone <ahs3@debian.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Steve,

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:02 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:06:16 +0800
> Zamir SUN <sztsian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > >
<snip>
> > So, for me, there is no more issue for Fedora packaging.
> >
>
> So should I just add that one patch and tag it?

Just a thought, if you see
https://repology.org/project/linux-tools/versions then you will notice
that libtracevent has been packaged by the distros with a version of
v5.x+, and I will have the same problem for Debian also. Do you think
it makes sense to start  with a version of v6.x when you tag it? If
that is not possible then we will have to use epoch like we did for
libbpf.


-- 
Regards
Sudip