Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:55:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:54:50 -0500 Received: from marine.sonic.net ([208.201.224.37]:51744 "HELO marine.sonic.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:54:41 -0500 X-envelope-info: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:55:14 -0800 From: Mike Castle To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.4.14-pre6 Message-ID: <20011031115514.F1767@thune.mrc-home.com> Reply-To: Mike Castle Mail-Followup-To: Mike Castle , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1004556431.11209.51.camel@mistress> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:38:44AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Then, 2.4.15 would be the point where I start 2.5.x, and where Alan gets > to do whatever he wants to do with 2.4.x. Including, of course, just > reverting all my and Andrea's VM changes ;) There are a lot of patches applied to -ac that are not in the main line. If many of those are applied to 2.4.16+, would they also be put into the 2.5.x line early in the process so that they will be fairly synced, plus give you ample time to feel comfortable with their stability? Especially patches that did not come directly from the maintainers. mrc -- Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/