Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751521AbWHJT4z (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:56:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751491AbWHJT4H (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:56:07 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:15744 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbWHJTz1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:55:27 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:54:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Jason Lunz , Alan Cox , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org References: <1155144599.5729.226.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060810190222.GA12818@knob.reflex> <20060810194734.GE11829@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20060810194734.GE11829@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608102154.25594.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 30 On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:47, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10 2006, Jason Lunz wrote: > > In gmane.linux.kernel, you wrote: ]--snip--[ > > > > It's not surprising you're not getting many bug reports. It's common for > > several things to go wrong during s2ram, and the user often ends up > > looking at a hung system with a dead screen. It takes some quality time > > with netconsole to even begin to narrow down that it's IDE hanging the > > system, after which you can *begin* solving the no-video-on-resume > > issue. > > I'm not on any of the suspend lists, I was merely comparing the > suspend-others or suspend-libata ration to suspend-ide on linux-kernel, > and the latter is clearly in the minority. I've used ide suspend quite a > bit myself, and never had issues with it (or whichever ones I saw > initially, I fixed). Of course it depends very much on the hardware. I'd > still say that ide suspend probably supports a much wider range of > hardware, than does libata suspend. As far as the suspend to disk is concerned, you are probably right, but I'm not sure about the suspend to RAM. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/